The vintologi bible

Download the latest version of the vintologi bible http://docdro.id/4ikqQPz

The vintologi bible

PostPosted by Administrator » Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Vintologi is simply the belief that our soul is eternal and "might is right". Currently vintologi comes in 3 versions, vintologi6 is currently the newest version while vintologi5 is the oldest version still linked.

Version 0 of vintologi http://vintologi.clanz.co/topic4.html (general).

Version 5 of vintologi http://www.docdro.id/HgvkAVH (darwinian).

Version 7 of vintologi http://www.docdro.id/dICtn4k (darwinian).

Version 6 of vintologi http://docdro.id/4ikqQPz (darwinian).

Your consciousness is real, what is perceived as quantum randomness is actually the free wills of the universe making choices, the brain is a quantum computer and your soul is immortal.

When you live you learn to accept your new body and with time your body and brain becomes you but it is not permanent, after death your soul will need a new body and you are likely to end up with something similar to your old body except smaller, the probability for reincarnation decreases with genetic distance.

Your free will do have power, you are not only able to affect the current life but also future lives.

There is no such thing as absolute morality but your action do have consequences that you may like or dislike, it can be difficult to evaluate the actual results of your actions, especially if you have low intelligence(belonging to the 99%). Only a few of us have a fair chance of actually determining which results their actions will have, the result is often the blind leading the blind not being able to know who to listen to.

Propaganda and brute force can be used to influence the world according to your preferences. In this modern age propaganda is very important. There is no single true version of vintologi, different communities can form different types of vintologi depending on their personal preferences.

If you like getting raped as a female you are likely to be against rape being legal in the future. If you are male now you have to ask yourself if you would enjoy getting raped by your husbands in future lives as a female, if males where honest and actually think about it most would answer yes to that question. Maybe you would prefer to live in a strictly patriarchal society were males buy wives to rape and humiliate and were females is reduced to property.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Might is right

PostPosted by Administrator » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:45 pm

How do you determine which preferences that will be satisfied when there is no absolute morality? well it is pretty simple 0 1 2

Image
with brute force(extreme violence) and propaganda you will be able to impose your preferences upon others, might is right.

While ordinary citizens get imprisoned for murder, robbery and theft the rulers can do the same crimes in massive numbers without any consequences. By having superior might you can enforce any morals into the masses and they will happily accept them no matter how obvious the contradictions are. Popular lies have ever been the most potent enemies of personal liberty.

Only slaves are born into contracts, the most important freedom is the freedom to dominate the unfit, Survival of the fittest is the law of this world. An inherently strong person becomes weak and destructive by following false morals and reason. It is not possible to gain true power without using methods currently viewed as unethical. Christianity is a religion for slaves.

Death and destruction are necessary to the health of the world, and therefore as natural, and lovable, as birth and life. Only priests and born cowards moan and weep over dying. Brave men face it with approving nonchalance.

Laws and rules imposed on you, from days of old renown, are not intended for your “good” but for your crushing down. Then dare to rend the chains that bind, and to yourself be true. Dare to liberate your mind, from all things, old and new.

Equality can only exist between equals. Civilization implies division of labor, division of labor implies subordination and subordination implies injustice and inequality. Government is founded on property. Property is founded on conquest. Conquest is founded on power. All power is founded on brain and brawn.

The rules of life are not to be found in Korans, Bibles, Decalogues and Constitutions, but rather the rules of decadence and death. The “law of laws” is not written in Hebrew consonants or upon tables of brass and stone, but in every man’s own heart. He who obeys any standard of right and wrong, but the one set up by his own conscience, betrays himself into the hands of his enemies, who are ever laying in wait to bind him to their millstones. And generally a man’s most dangerous enemies are his neighbours.

The lie that is known to be a lie is half eradicated, but the lie that even intelligent persons regard as a sacred fact – the lie that has been inculcated around a mother’s knee – is more dangerous to contend against than a creeping pestilence.

The natural world is a world of war; the natural man is a warrior; the natural law is tooth and claw. All else is error. A condition of combat everywhere exists. We are born into perpetual conflict. It is our inheritance, even as it was the heritage of previous generations. Superiority and inferiority can only be decided by battle.

Take from the peasantry even an infinitesimal proportion of their petty property, and they will lynch you as a lazy thievish tramp; but two-thirds of their harvests by law and rule (tax) and they will turn out in the middle of the night, to cheer you in your steam-horsed palace car, as it whirls through their ‘God forsaken’ villages.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

The value of a human life

PostPosted by Administrator » Mon Apr 24, 2017 6:49 pm

When valuing individual lives you have to look at the particular individual and the society as a whole. Death always leeds to reincarnation and a new life, the new life can be better or worse, it is better to die with honor than to end up having a miserable life. In general human life is of little value, the current overestimation of the value of human life has lead to a very bad situation in our society.

What is important for each individual is the quality of their lives and their individual moral preferences, not how long the individual lives. Suicide is a perfectly rational solution if the personal problems is too big.

An particular human can be both beneficial and harmful towards other humans. We need enough people getting children to maintain the population and which makes sure most humans will reincarnate as humans and not something else. An individual with valuable genes will be able to improve the upcoming generations by spreading the genes and should be considered as valuable.

Mass murderers and humans that torture only inflict short suffrage, an individual that makes the gene pool worse will inflict suffering for many generation. The opposite can be said for improving the quality of the gene pool. An increase in intelligence will result in a better society for many upcoming generations.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Abortions and infanticide

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 3:39 pm

It does not matter if consciousness has developed or not. It is currently unknown when consciousness is developed in a child/fetus and it does not matter, if consciousness is developed in the fetus it will simply reincarnate after the abortion.

There is nothing wrong in murdering defective children, it is however a sin to kill a fetus that has good genes and health, even if the fetus is unconscious. Even a child with average genes might turn out to be valuable.

Aborting your own child is genetic suicide but if a female abort her child it will also result in her husband spreading his genes less, thus we must allow the husband to veto the abortions. We also have to ask our self why not also make infanticide legal of both parents agree? In the past infanticide was most likely a common method to avoid starvation. The genetic interest argument could be continued indefinitely(what about your sister is planning to do an abortion/infanticide).

You may of course also be against abortion itself for many reason, this is of course a personal preference, another personal preference is that you want a lot of babies impaled/raped.

When a child is aborted a specific genetic setup is eliminated before we know much about how good that particular combination is, this is only a good form of eugenics for obvious defects but it is not ideal if we want to improve average iq.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Murders and executions

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 3:44 pm

People that get murdered/executed will simply reincarnate while relatives will suffer from grief. Murder is however an effective form of punishment since most people today fear death and grief will be inflicted upon their friends and family.

The issue with killing people is that they might have valuable genes or get even more hrainwashed the next life. Morality in vintologi is messy and very complicated, you can justify pretty much any action with twisted logics or personal preferences. The people that breivik killed did not have valuable genes and while some white people was killed his action will probably result in more white people of higher quality than the ines breivik killed.

The ones killed by Breivik were lucky, they most likely lost the tragic memories and brain pollution and reincarnated, the survivors had to live with their memories and grief over lost friends. Many of the ones suffering in greif over the Utøya executions are responsible for disastrous goverment policies and have only themselves to blame, of course some of them were innocent but if you cut out cancer some healthy tissue will be lost too.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Soul purification

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 3:51 pm

When your body dies you will lose most if not all memories and this is a good thing. When you live your soul becomes polluted by false beliefs and death is often the only cure. When you reincarnate your soul gets pure again and will be able to live a new amazing life.

Children with past life memories generally become a lot happier when they forget these memories and can move on with their current life, generally children with past life memories start to forget them at the age 5 and do not remember anything as an adult.

If you do reach important conclusions in one life you can easily make them generally available and you might get a good use for that the upcoming lives. If you write a good book you might read it an upcoming life and liking it, not knowing you wrote it yourself. Most stuff you learn in your life is unfortunately useless or more than useless, you might believe it is important information when it isn't. When you are reborn you are able to experience childhood again and grow up with new friends, starting a new life instead of being old and miserable.

Mental disorders such as christianity, ocd, depression are all cured by death. It might be hard to accept for born cowards but death is the solution for all personal problems, if your current life is miserable dying is most likely a good thing. It is very difficult to help victims of severe brainwashing before they die and reincarnate, most people are not willing to accept that they have been fooled and will not accept help even if it is offered for free.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

How we should view children

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 3:52 pm

Children do have smaller brains and less knowledge(in general) than adults, their souls is also a lot more pure, they have become less corrupted by society. One current view is that children needs to be looked after and controlled by their parents until they are 18 or even higher(in Sweden the state can decide to take care over you until you are 21).
Image
While adults generally have better cognitive abilities than children the difference is much smaller than what most adults believe, there is no shortage of kids that are a lot smarter than 99% of the adults. From the chart above we see that male children at the age 8 has larger brains than adult females, females in general should be viewed as brainpolluted children.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Early sex and pair bonding

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 3:54 pm

Currently we have a lot of age based rules, in the US and many other countries you can end up in jail for having sex with a 15 year old. In most countries you cant even take a license to drive a car of your own until you are 18, you are not even permitted to buy sex toys before you are 18. These high age limits is all about government control and creating criminals, in reality your ability for independent decision making is mostly about genetics and not age.

The lack of cognitive abilities in females(all ages) supports the idea of early patriarchal marriage, not a high legal age. Most females would benefit from early arranged marriage(from the age of sexual maturity), of course the females must end up liking the man before the marriage occurs.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Rape and forced marriages

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 3:55 pm

Assume we have two tribes, one with strong(genetically superior) males and another with weak(inferior) males. If the tribe with strong males kill the weak males in the other tribe and rape the women the following will happen
1. The weak men from the other tribe will die and reincarnate
2. the females will experience being raped and humiliated
3. the children born will be genetically better.
4. In the upcoming lives everyone will benefit by having better genes.

it is obvious 3 and 4 is good, but what about the female experience? reports has shown that a large part of the females orgasm during rape, some experience their first orgasm. Some females even admit to like being raped
The second is that I ORGASMED from being raped. That shocked me, shook me rigid, made me disgusted with myself and made me realise all my feminist ideals were wrong. Not simply wrong in fact, but stupid and, above all, MORALLY wrong.

He understood the darkness within my heart, the longing to relive my rape in a 'safe' environment, the desire to be beaten and humiliated, verbally insulted and made to understand my own utter worthlessness on every level.

I suppose I'm a masochist, craving pain, usage, rape, constant degradation.

According to the bible the punishment for rape should be marriage:

If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29)

Females generally want to exchange sex for resources, in order to provide for the children, if a man rapes a woman she might get good genes but the man will not have to provide any resources. If a females if married against her will she will(sex slave) the man will still provide for her.
Image
If you force a female to marry she will not be able to pick a man according to her preferences but due to the choices females do treating females like a property might actually be better for the gene pool 3 4

Proposed laws
-The husband is allowed to rape a female he is married to.
-you are not allowed to rape a females that is married to someone else.
-an unmarried female can be raped from the age of 18 when alone with a male in a private place.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Returning to polygamy

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:01 pm

Without enforced monogamy the most successful/attractive males will have multiple wives, this will lead to a lot harder competition for females and a less stable society which is a good thing. A less stable society will be needed for racial improvements and hence stability isn't desirable. With shortage of females the men will be needed to take larger risks and the stupid cowards will be eliminated from the gene pool. Polygamy allows most males to leave the society while maintaining population growth.

Image

The disadvantage with polygamy is that it decreases the evolutionary pressure on females due to the shortage of them, there exist no humane solutions for this but one inhumane solution is to draft stupid stupid/ugly females to dangerous wars, this is the real advantage with female draft. Even with female shortage a lot of low value females will prove themselves out of the sexual market and not get any children, their lack of self awareness will lead to an evolutionary failure.

Without Polygamy it will only be possible for a man to impregnate a female once a year which isn't desirable. The best example of Polygamy is Charles Lindbergh. Polygamy will also make it possible for a female to find begin a relationship with a more attractive male(all females will benefit from it due to less completion for good males).

It is a matter of preference if you prefer to have a monogamous relationship or several partners. The emotional benefit for the male with more than one wife is that it will be emotionally easier for him if a wife divorce him(more than 50% of marriages end up in divorce) since he will be less emotionally attached to each woman. The females will get the emotional benefit of being with a very good man and a lot of females prefer sharing a good man over being alone with an unattractive man. supporting polygamy is a sensible thing to do because men already like having many partners, it enhances personal freedom, helps to prevent or minimize adultery, is an integral part of some culture, was practiced by great men of Christianity and Islam and other religions, helps to decrease the number of single women in society, helps men with leadership ability, it indicates that men are humanitarian, and it is a normal human practice.

The media wants us to believe that humans are naturally monogamous. We are not. Men have always been intended to be polygamist, while women are what their men make them, which is monogamous. The basic concept of marriage is that the man invests in the family in return for the sexual fidelity of his wife. This way, the man can invest in kids who he knows are his. It is well known that women prefer men who are successful with other women. The evolutionary benefits are obvious. A man who has the opportunity to spread his genes to many women will probably produce sons with the same opportunity, thereby also spreading the mother's genes. This would indicate that women would actually prefer to marry men who can have sex with other women.

So why do western women insist on the opposite? western women do not want a good man. They are taught that they should dominate and control their men, a position which women were never intended to fill. If the husband agrees and commits to sexual fidelity, then he has shown that he is weak and has failed the test. By committing to sexual fidelity, he is showing that he has no backbone and will give in to his wife on all issues. If his wife believes her husband's commitment, she will view him as a doormat and will soon find him boring and lose interest in having sex with him. If she doesn't believe his commitment, she will consider him a lying bastard and the marriage will be full of drama until it finally falls apart. Either way, the husbands loses. By refusing to commit to sexual fidelity, the husband passes the shit test. The wife will then feel that she still needs to compete with other women to hold on to her husband, so she will continue to be sexually attracted to him.

Gender imbalance
The demand for females will always be much greater than the supply in a typical society even if polygamy isn’t common, this leads to gynocentrism when females are allowed to choice their husbands. Males in a country turning into substitutes such as porn, gay sex and prostitutes does not resolve the issue since females have the opportunity to mate with people outside the country, especially attractive females which we want to keep in the gene pool.

Hard patriarchy does however have the disadvantage of not eliminating unattractive males for the gene pool, when males are in total control the only sexual selection will be against females resulting in unattractive females being discarded while unattractive males will be able to spread there genes simply by just buying females

Cuckolding
One clever strategy for a female is to use one as provider and another man as fucker/sperm donor), she will then get the best of both world. With the current laws the paternity will go to the husband and not the biological father, he will most likely end up paying child support for a child that isn't his.

A good male will by definition not accept the current horrible marriage deal where the female gets all the power and the male will be punished hard during a breakup, often marriages are sexless and only a way for females to get economic security, these psychopath females are suitable for mating. There is nothing wrong with cuckolding pathetic males 5
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

free market contracts instead of gynocentric marriage

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:21 pm

Free market contract will make sure both partners get a good deal in the case they want to marry, the female could agree to become a sex-slave and monogamous in return for economic security and that the husband is limited to only two wives at the time.

Different churches/communities could also come up with marriage contracts they are confortable with allowing each community to live according to their beliefs, some might prefer no marriage at all while other people prefer to live strictly monogamous.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Vintologi churches

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:44 pm

Each church will have it's own rituals and beliefs, with time some rituals and beliefs will be common for all churches and become a part of the vintologi religion. The church is lead by a single individual called "Church general", f the church owner also lead the church activities he will have the title "church führer".

There is currently no shortage of empty christian churches that can be converted to vintologi churches, when a church is converted everything christian about it should be removed and burned. We also need good sex rooms in the case some church members wants to make love in the church.

Instead of fictional gods we look up to real people such as Charles Lindbergh, Anders Behring Breivik, William Luther Pierce, Gustav II Adolf. We can also have fictional characters such as Earl Turner(the turner diaries) and Oscar Yeager as role models. Common church activities can be reading good material, telling stories, answering questions, explaining the religion and related science, music.

Weddings
A vintologi church should offer wedding ceremonies, these weddings cant be legally binding with the current laws.
Image

Membership
The chief vintologist decides the membership criteria and membership alone, you cannot expect to just join any church. In order to become a member you must first be judged by 5 to 9 church members when you are naked, in addition i will demand that members id free from STD, understand vintologi, is an attractive Caucasian and don't mutilate their children. If you have poor genes you should not join a vintologi church, just kill yourself and take other losers with you.

Holy woman
A holy woman is selected for her intelligence and beauty to represent a vintologi church. A holy woman should have a lot of sex and isn't allowed to use any contraception. A holy woman that doesn't have a male partner should attend the church naked.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Building vintologi communities

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:45 pm

There is no shortage of successful religious communities. In order to have a successful community we need to have a good female/male ratio(preferable 2), in the conversion phase a good female/male ratio can be archive by only accepting males with large cocks(volume>230cm³) as members but this will change when the church members has a lot of children. The males born into the religion will only be able to get 1 or in some cases 2 wives unless they start their own cult/community and this is a good thing.

Having a lot of single males is not healthy for the community and polygamy will result in a lot of single males unless there is a constant female over recruitment, the fundamentalist Mormons usually solves this by convincing males to do missionary work and expelling a lot of them from the cult.

Joining a Vintologi church will always be a privilege, it will be reserved to the best among us. The vintologi will be an honest community, no lies will be needed to keep it together. It will be very easy to leave a Vintologi community and very difficult to be accepted as a member.

The FLDS community lead by Warren Jeffs was able to take control over the local police and hopefully we will also be able to gain enough power to avoid harassment from the law enforcement. Nazi flags and other hostile symbolism should be avoided, we want to build a peaceful community and expand the religion by breeding, not going to war against the system and attracting failed individuals to the cult.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Living as a minority

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:49 pm

You cannot fully follow vintologi and also follow the laws and norms of your country. When we are small in numbers running and hiding will be the proper thing to do, defeating the military and maintaining control over the country will be very difficult unless at least 10% of the population support you.

When we are small in numbers we will be forced to blend in the society and not be perceived as a hostile group. When our numbers is small the proper thing to do is to reproduce in massive numbers, their is no point in sanctifying ourselves like Breivik did.

When our numbers grow we will be able to take more and more control over the countries we live in and make the conditions for vintologi better. Examples of political goals is lowered age of consent, better marriage laws(polygamous), abolish the system of child support, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, eugenics instead of dysgenics.

Just being armed with legal weapons is unlikely to be enough to fight tyranny, we have look at illegal weapons such as mortars, car bombs, machine guns and even weapons of mass destruction. Other useful tools is tor browser and anonymous cryptocurrencies(paid assassinations).

We do not want to be to accepted, if vintologi is generally disliked only the independent minded will be attracted to the religion. We want our members to accept vintologi despite being exposed to propaganda in school and remeasure by peers to conform to the norms. Building communities where all people like vintologi might actually be a bad thing since it will make it easier for our enemies to crush us.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Polycentric law

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:51 pm

Ultimately what's right and wrong is determined by battle, most people want to avoid war and hence the people with powerful weapons will be motivated to cooperate. Power centralization is very dangerous(hundreds of millions have been killed by their government).

Polycentric law is a legal structure in which providers of legal systems compete or overlap in a given jurisdiction, as opposed to monopolistic statutory law according to which there is a sole provider of law for each jurisdiction. Devolution of this monopoly occurs by the principle of jurisprudence in which they rule according to higher law.

If we manage to crush the current system we will most likely end up with polycentric law. Since your power is related to your violence and terror potential people and groups will be motivated to arm themselves a lot which will solve the issue of national defence.

How long will a system of polycentric law last? It depends on the population, if the population is willing to sacrifice security and simplicity for freedom it is likely to last a long time period. If most people prefer to have a state it will not take long before they got the state they wanted(and high taxes)
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Anarcho-darwinism

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 4:56 pm

One example of a stateless society is medieval iceland which lasted 290 years, their society was much more stable than any republic and also more stable than the democracy ancient Greece had.

When the majority of the population does not accept slavery(paying taxes) or other forms of abuse the Nash equilibrium will be anarcho-capitalism since people would use violence against any aggressors, of course not everyone will be protected, genetic trash will hopefully end up in the bottom without any rights. With anarcho-capitalism the best among the population will end up at the top by acquiring a lot of wealth but almost everyone will benefit(this is the disadvantage, helps the poor too).

The non-agression principle in anarcho darwinism is simply a nash equilibrium, there is nothing wrong with initiating violence against the unfit. The vikings practised anarcho-darwinism to some extent with their raids, they raided the racially less fit. The desired nash equilibrium can only be archived when the society is ethnically homogeneous enough and of high enough quality, thus you have to be restrictive with immigration in order to maintain the stateless society.

In a fully privatized society the land-owners will determine who is permitted to different parts of the country and private courts will solve any disputes. Land may get confiscated from genetically inferior people by the genetically superior, this can be done by private armies that invade areas and sell the conquered land for profit.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

The futility of limited government

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 5:02 pm

Alex Linder wrote:The constitution -- the only one -- you can have faith in is not the one on paper but in the high-quality men who will not tolerate the infringement of their freedoms and prerogatives.

A state, in accordance with generally accepted terminology, is defined as a compulsory territorial monopolist of law and order (an ultimate decision maker). Feudal lords and kings did not typically fulfill the requirements of a state; they could only "tax" with the consent of the taxed, and on his own land every free man was as much a sovereign (ultimate decision maker) as the feudal king was on his. However, in the course of many centuries, these originally stateless societies had gradually transformed into absolute – statist – monarchies. While they had initially been acknowledged voluntarily as protectors and judges, European kings had at long last succeeded in establishing themselves as hereditary heads of state. Resisted by the aristocracy but helped along by the "common people," they had become absolute monarchs with the power to tax without consent and to make ultimate decisions regarding the property of free men.

Thanks to the great advances in economic and political theory since the late 1700s, in particular at the hands of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard, we are now able to give a precise answer to this question. According to Mises and Rothbard, once there is no longer free entry into the business of the production of protection and adjudication, the price of protection and justice will rise and their quality will fall. Rather than being a protector and judge, a compulsory monopolist will become a protection racketeer – the destroyer and invader of the people and property that he is supposed to protect, a warmonger, and an imperialist.

Indeed, the inflated price of protection and the perversion of the ancient law by the English king, both of which had led the American colonists to revolt, were the inevitable result of compulsory monopoly. Having successfully seceded and thrown out the British occupiers, it would only have been necessary for the American colonists to let the existing homegrown institutions of self-defence and private (voluntary and cooperative) protection and adjudication by specialized agents and agencies take care of law and order 6

The only real limit of state power is the threat of violent uprising, this can be limited severely by disarming the population, if the population isn't willing and able to fight for freedom the result can be disastrous. Both USSR and china under Mao has constitutions claiming to give rights to the people, history has teaches us over and over again that papers are a useless defense against tyranny.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

The fear of death is a threat to liberty

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 5:06 pm

A person afraid of dying is easy to control, a coward is simply someone afraid of dying. Christianity and odinism has offered a false sense of security for the masses, if someone believes he will come to valhalla after dying in battle he will be more likely to be brave. In reality you do not know how your next life will be, you might end up living as the opposite gender of even on another planet.

A person that doesn't fear death is a lot more difficult to enslave https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A he will protect his family without hesitation and be a dangerous warrior. If you accept vintologi you will accept that death isn't the end, you will simply reincarnate and be reborn. It is better to live a short honorable life than to live a long life in a cage, what matters is the quality of your life and how it affects your future lives, not how long it is.

Image
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

About high technology

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 5:09 pm

Advanced technology and science has made it possible to understand the world in a way that previously was impossible, this religion could never have been created without high technology and science.

With technology it is easier for a few individuals to get a lot more power, technology makes armed resistance a lot more difficult and fewer people is needed to keep up the government. Technology such as television and radio has been used as brainwashing tools controlling the masses and imposing destructive changes to our society.

Advanced technology is a huge advantage in wars and we saw this in the Israel-Palestine conflict. With high technology you can kill your enemies in massive numbers with minimal casualties.

Internet is decentralized in theory and allows for people that are interested to find a lot of good information, unfortunately not many people have the will and intelligence to separate the facts from the fiction. Internet has changes the playing field but it remains to bee seen if internet will bring down the current system or if it only will make it worse. Internet allows us to be anonymous(especially with Tor and proper security habits) but it also allows for the government and companies to collect information about most people easily. In 2016 the ZK-snarks technology was finally good enough to allow anonymous messages and value transactions.

Ted kaczynski wrote an interesting manifesto about the downsides with technology and a lot of what he write is true. Technology and socialism currently makes is very easy to survive but it will be difficult in the future, the population of humans has been increased exponentially and eventually it needs to end. One important factor Kaczynski does not mention is the fact that the difficulty of getting a female has increased with the technological advancements, when females no longer need men they get more picky and a lot of unattractive men get weeded out of the gene pool.

For a long time the unfit masses has been able to reproduce without major difficulties, this is likely to change in the future as the society collapses.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

we do not need a state

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 5:37 pm

The state is just people using violence to enforce their will and it is mostly boring today, my proposal is to instead of large states have smaller entities such as polygamous families where the husband can abuse his wives, maybe bring back gladiator games where we can have some fun watching people get eaten by lions. We do need good leaders but giving any entity the monopoly of violence democratic or not is very dangerous.

In a free society you will be able to live your life according to your preference. Currently our society isn't free at all, we get imprisoned for breaking laws and many of these crimes lacks victims. A lot of innocent males correctly gets imprisoned for sex crimes(age of consent and rape laws) and a lot of people get their children stolen from them by the state despite being good parents.

With the growth of mass democracy (the abolition of poll taxes and other qualifications for voters, and the enfranchisement of non-Whites), the rise in the influence of the mass media on public opinion, the U.S. government was gradually transformed into the malignant monster it is today. We are now in a society where the government wants to control every aspect of our lives in all developed countries on earth, it is harder and harder to live the live we want to live without getting imprisoned for breaking laws while the government is free to break every law and constitution.

People have different preferences and we will never be able to make everybody happy. We can however make most people satisfied via the free market and a free society in general, there will still be failure and suffering but that is short term. The free market is vastly superior any government allocating resources correctly 7 8

Not everyone is suitable to live in a free society but the ones ill suited for that will be eliminated from the gene pool and there suffering will come to an end. If you keep the unfit alive by artificial means you will end up with more and more failure and suffering until the entire society fails. The freedom to fail is a very important freedom, nothing good comes from trying to protect people from their own stupidity. If someone wants to kill himself or destroy the brain with drugs, let him to it.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

About mental fitness

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 5:40 pm

Mental illness is a real issue, we all suffer from the limitations/flaws of our human brains and some people have very severe brain disorders. During the Rosenhan experiment it was shown that we cannot trust psychiatrists but it did not invalidate the concept of mental illnesses.

Mental fitness is a continuum, one aspect of mental fitness of logical intelligence, another important factor is spatial intelligence. One very important ability is to realise you are wrong before it is too late. Examples of severe brain failure is belief in Christianity or any form of socialism.

The reality is that most people are incapable of making rational independent decisions even when they have a huge incentive to make the correct decision.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Mass-voting doesn't work

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 5:52 pm

The incentive to make the correct decision will decrease when the probability of your vote changing the outcome is low, considering the low intelligence or the average voter democracy will never result in an outcome the voters actually want and thus the entire thing is pointless.

In order to make the system work we need to have much more restrictive voting requirements, which can be based on IQ, taxes paid or personal preferences people doing selection have. With a IQ based system for the united states each state will have IQ-tests to determine the right to vote(only top 1% will be accepted), this itself may be enough to make the system work somehow.

The advantage with a system based on taxes paid is that it will be very objective and also represent the tax-payer better than any other system. The issue with pure elite rule is that the elite may not choose new members for the elite in a good way(this is why companies and organisations often fail).
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Objective elite rule

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 6:07 pm

The house of representatives will have 999 seats and they will represent the tax payers, each day one member of the house of representatives will be replaced by a random taxpayer, the probability of being selected should be proportional to the amount of taxes paid. The senate will have 15 seats and the senators choose their successors freely.

A0 member of the senate.
A1 deputy senator
A2 second to forth successor to senator.
A3 member of the house of representatives.
A4 former member of congress.
B0 top 10% of B-citizens.
B1 top 1% in national iq-test but not top 10% of B-citizens.

Members of the house of representatives are randomly choosen among the the taxpayers where the probability to be selected will be {the amount of taxes paid by the individual}/{total amount of taxes paid to the state}

Impeachment
In order to impeach(replace/remove) a senator {the number of senators opposing the inpeachment}^2 win margin(yes votes minus no votes) in the house of reprasentatives is required.

84042008
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Ruling over an organisation or region

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 6:10 pm

The simplest method involves only one individual and this allows one individual to have fun as an abusive ruler. Sure being a tyrant oppressing people can be fun but getting a position of real power can be very difficult and your power is often limited, in most of your lives you will be the one oppressed with a monarchy, democracy or other forms of system where a large amount of people are governed by a single state.

You might thing there exist ways to rule a country that isn't abusive, well we do not want the horrors of democracy, elite rule could work but it is still dangerous unless it is voluntary.

My proposed system for small organizations is a board of 5 individuals that chooses their own successors. Each Board member will be able to select a certain number of new members, this requires confirmation by the current members(ordinary majority) and that at least 4 members has selected the full number of new members(the fift will be allowed to select new members later). An unanimous board will be able to expel current members or freely add new members.

The members can request that each board member add new members in a certain order(at most once during any 30-day period).

A board member can request change about how the organization is governed, when this is requested all members will be allowed to vote on the proposal and a margin of 0.1*(the number of members) votes will will be required for each board-member that does not approve the change except for one.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Decision making and consequences

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 6:32 pm

Your decisions always have consequences, these can sometimes be difficult to know. Making good decisions itself isn’t free, when you spend time trying to figure out the rational endeavour you lose time that could have been used to benefit you in other ways. High intelligence makes it a lot easier to arrive at the correct conclusion during a given time and allows you to influence the future according to your preferences.

You will have to accept that you are wrong sometimes, eventually it will be cured with death or by changing your mind.

Your decisions may also affect future lives, if you have good genes and have a lot of children the probability of you ending up with good genes the next life will increase slightly, this is a form of karma but individual action hardly matters, your decisions are not important unless you have a lot of power.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

genetic preferences

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 7:35 pm

Your actions now will affect which genes you end up having in future lives. Lets assume you are a female that prefer small cocks and only breed with males that have that both feature, this will result in a temporary decrease in average penis size but since most females have a different preference the average cock size will still converge to the average preference. If you kill all humans of the Caucasians race a new similar race would eventually evolve, it would take hundreds of thousands of years but it would eventually happen, you will just be forced to live thousands of generations as different races.

Mutations in genes often occur, most of these mutations are bad and without any form of selection(natural or conscious) the gene pool will deteriorate with time until we can no longer support the dysgenic civilisation.

Harsh environment → humans with bad genes get weeded out → technology advancements → dysgenic breeding → collapse

Which types of genes/species that survive is determined by the environment, an advantageous trait in one environment might be disadvantageous in a different environment. Currently which genes that is likely to survive is determined by human action.

If females prefer a certain male trait that trait is likely to be more common simply due to female preference, it does not have do be advantageous for survival. Humans have genetic preferences and these preferences is similar for most humans(all races).
Image
All dog breeds including the Caucasian Ovcharka and German Stepherd are obviously inferior to the Gray wolf on several key aspects such as intelligence. Human controlled breeding rarely give desirable results, especially when it is done by the state(eugenics), civilization in general has lead to a lot of degeneration among humans similar to what we see with dogs(less intelligence and aggression).

the need for the intelligence of the wolf was not a prerequisite for our domestication of them, we did not need it, and the early portion of the formation of the dog was in a change of eating patterns by pack rejects that started following human settlements and surviving on our refuse.

Diminishing their hunting intellect, by which we further exacerbated by obstructing the natural selection within their species by altering their breeding environment to meet our needs. the dumb dogs no longer died, dogs no longer died from stupid mistakes because they had humans to aid them, hunting intelligence was diminished because of food dependence upon humans etc etc. These were all unconscious decisions that led to the regression of the dogs cognitive capacity relative to the natural wolf.

Improving our own cognitive and health capacities through conscious and informed choices is absolutely, 100% factually able to work, it is supported by the knowledge of the process of evolutionary biology.

If you create an environment of ever increasing pressure to perform, and eliminate the non performers from the gene pool, the performers continue to improve performance. pure basic absolute biological fact.

Humans is now reaching a stage where the selection no longer is natural but instead conscious, it is up to each human to influence this conscious evolution and some will have a lot more influence than others.

Examples of unnatural selection is forced sterilization, the welfare state, executions, selection of sperm or egg when the parents isn't biological. Technology also allows for genetic engineering and selecting the best outcome from several fertilized eggs to avoid genetic disease and disability such as Cystic fibrosis.

Genetic manipulation of humans is very controversial but there is very good reasons for making the population more intelligent by natural or unnatural selection. The goal should not be to make all perfect with iq 160 but to increase the genetic material of humans in general, we still want great genetic variation between individuals and races.
Image

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Image

Currently it is easy to determine what is superior(beauty, intelligence, strength, health) but with time and conscious breeding it will become more and more about individual preferences. Penis size is a good example, currently the average is lower than the average preference(both sexes) but with time the average is likely to increase until the average in preference matches the actual average.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

About race

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 7:45 pm

Your soul no gender gender or race but you will with time get used to your body(mostly the brain) and be be likely to end up with something similar the next life, the probability for reincarnation decreases with genetic distance. If the population of a race increases the probability to reincarnate into the race will be come larger and the probability to reincarnate from the race to another one will become smaller. If a race become extinct the souls will most likely reincarnate into different human races.

In nature there is competition among races which drives weaker races to extinction. For most animals strength is mostly genetic but humans are an exception. The Caucasoid race is genetically stronger than all other races but our values make us weak, this will change if our religious/philosophical views change in favor of racial survival and advancements.
Image
There is a huge difference between different human races. One obvious difference is the difference in beauty where Caucasoid is generally(by all races) is regarded as most beautiful while primitive races is regarded as ugly.
Image
In a future life i would like to live as a beautiful Aryan woman and having many children. Unfortunately currently the Caucasian(white) race is decreasing in numbers while the other races in increasing and this development needs to stop. I want to live among intelligent and beautiful Aryans, not just this life but future lives.

About racemixing
Egalitarians have argued that people of mixed race are in some ways superior to people of unmixed race, and therefore race-mixing is desirable. This seems inconsistent with their position that there are no significant genetic differences between races, but egalitarians are not strongly committed to consistency.

Due to mutation and selection, the longer a population has been isolated from other populations, the more likely it is to have acquired alleles by mutation that other populations don’t have. Intrabreeding passes those alleles around within the population, so that people within that population are more likely to share alleles than are people from different populations , i.e., that population is more homozygous than is a population formed by combining that population with another population.

Now, when two populations interbreed to form a hybrid population, each parent population has accumulated, over tens or hundreds of thousands of years, a unique set of alleles that is close to the optimum for the particular environment it has been in, and that environment includes the environment its own members have created, e.g., their history, culture, and accumulated knowledge. Inevitably, the two parent populations have lived in different environments, and the hybrid population will live in the environment of one or both of the parent populations. Thus, the hybrid population will not have the collection of alleles that are most advantageous for either of those environments, a substantial loss of fitness, i.e., their likelihood of successfully reproducing is lessened.

When man makes a plant or animal hybrid, he carefully selects which offspring he will let survive and reproduce. Nature, too, selects ruthlessly and destroys thousands of crosses from different populations, leaving few, if any, hybrid survivors. (Patterson, 1999, p. 95). When the Caucasians arose, for example, there was no government aid to the less capable, and those who did not possess the most advantageous traits of both the Cro-Magnons and the Neanderthals simply died without issue. The very existence of the Caucasians in Europe proves that they, the hybrids, were more fit in Europe than either the Cro-Magnons or the Neanderthals who begot them.

With miscegenation today, however, few of the hybrids fail to survive and reproduce because food, shelter, medical and dental treatment, and social services are provided for them, whether or not they are sufficiently productive to pay for them. Instead of letting natural selection take its course, as it did when the Caucasian hybrids were born, the state requires the more fit to reduce their own chances of surviving and reproducing in order to enhance the chances of the less fit surviving and reproducing. Any farmer with an ounce of sense knows that all his plants and livestock are not all genetically equal, and so he selects his seed for his next year’s crop from only the best of his plants and animals; only egalitarians tell every seed that with a little manure it can be the equal of any other seed, however unfit it is.
Image
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

hate & love

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 7:46 pm

There is a lot of talk about hate-crimes, there is a body of laws against hate-crimes, everybody seams to be worried about hate. Hate appears to be the gravest problem of our time but hate is good, hate gives structure to our lives, it gives us a reason to exist, a focus, something to strive for, an identity. Hate allows us to see through lies and pretence, it helps us concentrate on the essential. Hate is democratic; the rich and powerful cannot hate more than their slaves/subjects and soon hate might be all that we have left.

Hate emancipates, without hate for slavery you cannot break your shackles, without hate for injustice their can be no justice. The greatest achievements of humans has grown from hate and the ability to control hate. Hate separates the humans from other animals, animals do not hate but humans do. Humans can hate for decades, sometimes for an entire life, we can even pass on hate to our children and grandchildren and keep hate alive for centuries. Hate is a sign of abstract intellect; only humans can hate people they have never seen or met, only humans can hate concepts and processes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll8quOF-9ZI

How can we know what love is if we refuse to recognise and understand hate? love and hate are the two opposite sides of the same coin. In order to be complete we need hate, only fools talk endlessly about hate but forget the hate. Hate separate us from the weak and docile masses.

Do not fear hate, do not deny or reject hate, accept hate and embrace hate, learn to know it and learn to use it. Hate is your most powerful weapon, a hidden source of your strength, do not deny it for you. What the current false elite fears most in this world is our ability to hate because our hate will one day our hate will be the most revolutionary force on the planet, our hate will destroy and create empires.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

War morality

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 7:52 pm

There is nothing inherently wrong with war. By war you can expand your borders or your population like the vikings did, strong men will be able to rape females and the strong men will be able to advance in the crushed society. Peaceful societies tend to be dysgenic while war-societies allows for the strong males to impregnate a lot of females. The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, no matter how clever constitution you craft you will eventually end up with harmful tyranny, the US is the best example of this.

If the population you crush has poor genes the rational thing to do is to kill them all, they will then reincarnate as humans with better genes and will hence benefit from being exterminated. If the population has good genes the rational thing to do is to rape the females and focusing on grapping power over them, a war of that nature is likely in the future due to increased political polarization.

Currently killing civilians is considered a war crime but this is of course nonsense, why should killing the civilian cowards be considered a bad thing, if anything killing brave soldiers is worse(they are likely to have better genes). It is important that soldiers get rewarded by their bravery by spreading their genes a lot if the survive, this cannot be fair individually(Breivik is unlikely to get any children) but it can be fair in general.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Darwinism and survival

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 7:54 pm

Genes that leads to suicidal behaviour will not last and thus with time in a certain environment suicidal behaviors such as using contraceptives will become less and less common. You should of course never ever use a condom or even worse take pills than ruins your sex-drive, prevents you from getting pregnant now and also have severe risks including death, that is suicidal.

Harsh competition for survival results in bad genes being weeded out of the gene pool and thus a more healthy population. You may realize that you yourself does not have very good genes we still in general benefit from doing our best to survive and multiply, your children might be lucky and end up having better genes than your.

By having a lot of children with individuals that also have good genes you improve the chances of also having good genes in future lives. You have an interest in people with high genetic quality spreading their genes a lot even if you are not closely related genetically, reincarnation to an individual of a different race is possible even though the probability is much smaller.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Saying no to contraceptives

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 7:57 pm

If you are not willing to have children with an individual you should not have sex in the first place, never humiliate yourself by having so called “protected sex”, if you are male you should never ever put a condom on your penis. Alex and oral sex is fine alternatives if you are not currently interested in having children. If you are male you should not care about unwanted/unplanned pregnancies, sire it can end up costing you money but that is no big issue, if you are intelligent making money should not be too difficult and there is currently the option of abusing government welfare.

Birth control pills is very harmful towards females and if you are female you should never take them for many reasons. If you are a female you should be selective and only have sex with the best among the males, the losers most be rejected.

If you are smart enough to realize you do have some poor genetics you should probably still have children since most stupid people are unable to accept their own inferiority, thus you should always have as many children as possible and let the weak ones die when the society collapses.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Healthy living

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 8:00 pm

A lot of people want to live healthy but are confused, a diet promoted as healthy might actually be very bad for you. In order to get an idea what is good for you you have to look at what humans have eaten during the last in the past, what food we have evolved to live well on.
Image
The grain and legume-based diet was originally only intended for slaves in the ancient Middle East and North Africa. It was a way to get a lot of calories in them, so they could work long and hard and not faint from hunger. The upper classes continued to eat a paleolithic diet.

Ever wondered why the grain-heavy diet promoted by the government is called a"pyramid diet? It's just like the diet given to slaves who built the pyramid. we should adopt a paleolithic diet and stop eating the slave diet.

It is not healthy to only eat food from plants 16 17 you also need meat 18 19 20 21

In order to build a strong body and give energy to the brain you will need enough calories and also enough nutritions, consuming a lot of calories in the forms of carps may not be ideal. Nuts are typically very calorie dense and low in carps.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Living your life to the full potential

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 8:02 pm

The human body has many amazing features. Each life will provide different capabilities, by training you can learn many skills and have great experiences even without having any special gifts.

Pregnancy, birth and breastfeeding
A lot of females today make the mistake of focusing mostly on career and misses the amazing experience of having a large family. As a male i misses that experience and instead have a provider and protector role or simply donating sperm.

Wars
Males have strong bodies for good reasons. Most people today misses the experience of wars and if we do participate in a war it will usually not benefit them in the upcoming lives. In the future males might be able to fight wars that actually makes their next lives good. Dying in combat is not a bad thing.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Hardcore sex

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 8:03 pm

Sex is not just about reproduction, it is also about bondage and pleasure. A good relationship between the man and the females is good for the female and the children, everyone will benefit from great sexual experiences. Good sex is brutal and similar to rape, most females like to get dominated.

Deep-throating

This requires a long enough penis and a skilled females, if the female is unwilling to perform deep-throating force may have to be used. If a female is new to deep-thraoting abstaining for food a period before the sex is recommended. the saliva in the throat will be useful as lubricant for anal sex.

Anal sex
Anal sex is even more fun when the female doesn't want to have it. A good way to fuck a female is to bend her over a Couch armrest, if she is still able to resist tape or handcuffs can be used to further restrict her movement. Males can also enjoy receiving anal sex, dildos can be used instead of actual males.

Making her pregnant
generally making females pregnant is a good thing and thus finishing in her pussy is a good idea. For pussy-fucking a cock of big girth is preferable, too long length may actually be a disadvantage here.

Spanking
Spanking is done with a palm, belt or another flexible object (tubes for watercooling are good). When the female doesn't do a good job deep-throating physical punishment is suitable.

Hateful sex is good sex, when you look down upon the female you fuck the sex will become good and this is why polygamy results in better sex. With polygamy a lot more females will become wives of good looking psychopaths and males will be forced to take females they dislike as partners resulting in much better sex(spanking and rape)

Sadism is a very important part of good sex, the females should be forced to swallow if the male finishes in her month or on a place where she can lick it up.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

About immatrial property

PostPosted by Administrator » Tue May 02, 2017 8:06 pm

The main reason to publish material should be to make it available for future lives and to experience the joy of creating culture. Patents currently lasts 20 years and you will be required to publish all important details on how your invention works and this is sensible. Currently copyright lasts 70 years after all content creators is dead and this is insanity. The following reforms needs to be made
-no software patents.
-copyright should last at most 30 years, preferable 20 years.
-copyright laws should not cover closed source software.

Currently copyright laws inhibits creativity by making it illegal to do improved versions of 100 year old work, the only winners with the current laws is a few companies with a lot of old material. Complete new concepts is rarely invented, most ideas is mostly previous ideas merged or modified. Innovation is mostly about incremental improvements, competitively new concepts is rarely invented.

All texts i write is meant to be improved, if i write a book i will be happy if someone makes an improved version of it(better grammar and content). My children don't need to make money of the work i have done, they will be just fine without any money from me.
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:39 pm

Next

Return to vintologi

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron