I remember watching videos by varg vikernes and he made it rather appealing, it's actually a bit similar to darwinian vintologi but it's less tied to the real world. I rely on high end science for vintologi while varg rely on intuition and tradition and this sometimes go wrong.
Generally major religious are pretty weak when it comes to metaphysics, christianity was partly based on incorrect plato philosophy.
At platos time we didn't understand neural network, the reason you know what a horse is is due to black box neural network, it gives the correct answer but you cannot explain why you know it.
Some aspects of maths are a part of the real world, we do not yet know which parts that are used in contruction our universe.
With religion you generally buy into a package of metaphysics (usually incorrect) fairy tales and subjective morality.
Pure metaphysics is not appealing to humans, you need to package it in a way that human like.
''I remember watching videos by varg vikernes and he made it rather appealing, it's actually a bit similar to darwinian vintologi but it's less tied to the real world. I rely on high end science for vintologi while varg rely on intuition and tradition and this sometimes go wrong.''
Varg practices psedo spirituality it's barbaric tribalism of what the pagans of old had in mind nothing new nothing interesting it's more pandeism the idea is mainly god is literally dead yeah no new psedo metaphysics it's just old rehashed creation worship i do offer a better reilgion the main idea is that reality itself is in gods mind and things are being created constantly within that god mind.
Generally major religious are pretty weak when it comes to metaphysics, christianity was partly based on incorrect plato philosophy.
Not all of plato was correct i do tend to view the theory of forms as correct but even then i take very few parts of platos philophy seriously i just take the forms theory.
At platos time we didn't understand neural network, the reason you know what a horse is is due to black box neural network, it gives the correct answer but you cannot explain why you know it.
Their is nothing special about consiousness persee what plato ascribed though is numbers mathmathics are found in some idylic world out their.
The main objection will be mainly maths doesn't actually exist in the real world but to say that is to basically say descriptive things don't actually exist as a feature of it when it does the fueture of reality is mathematics so it exists.
Some aspects of maths are a part of the real world, we do not yet know which parts that are used in contruction our universe.
I tend to think the entire thing is a mathmathical machine i have no way of proving it but digital phyiscs and it's ontology would lead to mathmathical realism.
With religion you generally buy into a package of metaphysics (usually incorrect) fairy tales and subjective morality.
Depends really psedo reilgions like the mystery cults islamic cults and most monotheistic cults yes your correct not so much with hinduism the idea is only bramha exists we are thoughts in this gods head