- Messages
- 916
https://incels.wiki/w/Henri_de_Toulouse-Lautrec
The article notes, "He had a genetic disorder that made it so his legs stopped growing after they were broken."
Most incels probably don't look like that. In their posts, they don't talk about having that kind of condition; they just talk about their subhuman face, but of course they don't provide any evidence for that because they don't wanna doxx themselves. If they were complaining about their height or their dick size, at least they could provide objective measurements so we'd know they weren't full of shit if they're telling the truth about that. Face is more subjective because a guy can take a bad pic one day and a better pic the next; look at the various pics of Jeremy Meeks, for instance. He was just lucky enough that his mugshot turned out well.
They're probably mostly handsome but nerdy high school students who are going to grow to be six feet tall and then when they finally replace their glasses with contact lenses, all the girls will be like, "Wow, he's so hot!" and be giving him their phone numbers.
Maybe this is why Incels.co has to ban so many people; if they allowed people to stay around for years, eventually these users would say, "Btw, I just ascended" and we would see how short-lived the inceldom of the average user is.
Even in the incel short film, the dude is not even all that subhuman; he's just betabuxx-tier. The girl in the library doesn't respond well to his advances because at that age, she's busy letting Chads fuck her, but 10-15 years down the line she'll be spreading her legs for that "incel" she rejected earlier, when she decides she doesn't feel like struggling to pay the bills via just her own salary.
And guess what, most guys who say, "I'd never accept a girl like that who didn't want me in her youth" will end up settling for/with a girl like that, rather than remaining volcel. The girl will find some way to get him to fall in love.
Then there's the large proportion of the incel population that consists of lazycels/brokecels, aka MGTOWs, aka divorced men who got tail years ago but are in a dry spell now because they have nothing to offer a chick, in terms of long-term relationship material. That's a legit problem, but it's not a Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec type of problem.
If they want a true picture of a typical "incel," it should be some socially awkward junior high school Chadlite who spoils his looks by wearing glasses, or an average-, maybe even above-average-, looking 40-year-old broke dude who lives in his mom's basement and probably has a neckbeard that's been growing for two months.
The article notes, "He had a genetic disorder that made it so his legs stopped growing after they were broken."
Most incels probably don't look like that. In their posts, they don't talk about having that kind of condition; they just talk about their subhuman face, but of course they don't provide any evidence for that because they don't wanna doxx themselves. If they were complaining about their height or their dick size, at least they could provide objective measurements so we'd know they weren't full of shit if they're telling the truth about that. Face is more subjective because a guy can take a bad pic one day and a better pic the next; look at the various pics of Jeremy Meeks, for instance. He was just lucky enough that his mugshot turned out well.
They're probably mostly handsome but nerdy high school students who are going to grow to be six feet tall and then when they finally replace their glasses with contact lenses, all the girls will be like, "Wow, he's so hot!" and be giving him their phone numbers.
Maybe this is why Incels.co has to ban so many people; if they allowed people to stay around for years, eventually these users would say, "Btw, I just ascended" and we would see how short-lived the inceldom of the average user is.
Even in the incel short film, the dude is not even all that subhuman; he's just betabuxx-tier. The girl in the library doesn't respond well to his advances because at that age, she's busy letting Chads fuck her, but 10-15 years down the line she'll be spreading her legs for that "incel" she rejected earlier, when she decides she doesn't feel like struggling to pay the bills via just her own salary.
And guess what, most guys who say, "I'd never accept a girl like that who didn't want me in her youth" will end up settling for/with a girl like that, rather than remaining volcel. The girl will find some way to get him to fall in love.
Then there's the large proportion of the incel population that consists of lazycels/brokecels, aka MGTOWs, aka divorced men who got tail years ago but are in a dry spell now because they have nothing to offer a chick, in terms of long-term relationship material. That's a legit problem, but it's not a Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec type of problem.
If they want a true picture of a typical "incel," it should be some socially awkward junior high school Chadlite who spoils his looks by wearing glasses, or an average-, maybe even above-average-, looking 40-year-old broke dude who lives in his mom's basement and probably has a neckbeard that's been growing for two months.
Last edited: