White individualism hasn't worked too well

Leucosticte

Well-known member
#1
White men decided, "We don't need solidarity; we can just be individualists and each go in our own direction, so we won't be stifled by the group's expectations. The white way is that each white guy searches for truth on his own; that's what science is about. The Wright Brothers were rugged individualists; had they cared about what the group thought, they couldn't have invented the airplane."

Okay, there's some truth to that, and that strategy worked for awhile, and then broke down. What happened is that groups that were organized (e.g. blacks, Jews, women, etc.) defeated these isolated individuals. We simply went too far in the direction of individualism and failed to make adequate use of the advantages of group cohesion.

Also, the individual white man who is held back by his flaws and weaknesses might say, "I'm a piece of shit; I don't deserve anything." Well, if you don't have pride in yourself, you should at least have pride in your race. If you don't think you can fix your own life, you can at least help out your race in small ways. United, we're stronger than the sum of the parts that make up the race. You probably have some skills you can contribute to the whole, even if those skills aren't enough to make you a rich man or get you pussy without the help of others.

Eventually, what goes around will come around. If we form a cohesive group, then the group will return the favor for the contributions the individual offers. It's kinda like how the Mormons, in exchange for your tithes, will let you marry a hot Mormon chick, except hopefully we'll go even further and offer even the neets some pussy, by adopting an ultra-patriarchal system where your parents or whatever can just buy you a chick.

You know, when I was in prison, the Aryan dudes used to fuck with the pedos. If I had it to do over, I would point out to the Aryan dude, "That's a fellow white guy; maybe you shouldn't fuck with him." Loyalty to race should transcend one's concern over whether a guy is being a pedo, especially since probably all he did was look at some CP.
 

Admin

Administrator
Moderator
#2
If we form a cohesive group, then the group will return the favor for the contributions the individual offers.
Capitalism largely eliminate the need for that since then you can just pay someone directly in cash and if your legal system is functioning you you can just go to court if the other individual fail to deliver.

Group cohesion and loyalty do however have value in a dysfunctional society since then other people may retaliate if the government turns on you and this can make authorities afraid to target anyone of said group, the issue is that the opposite can happen too "this group is dangerous and thus we need to target them".

If our society collapses it will be very valuable to be a part of a solid group where you can rely on each other, thus it's valuable to be in good terms with your extended family (parents, siblings, cousins, etc).
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
#3
Capitalism largely eliminate the need for that since then you can just pay someone directly in cash and if your legal system is functioning you you can just go to court if the other individual fail to deliver.
There are a lot of scenarios where one wouldn't want to use cash. For example, in a church, usually people are donating in accordance with their ability but receiving only in accordance with their need. A rich dude might be giving the church a lot of money and even performing services (e.g. maybe he plays the organ or sings in the choir), but he's not getting paid, the idea being that he's going to get paid in the afterlife, and in fact anything he were to get paid while on earth might diminish what God is going to give him later.

Also, some people, no matter how much you pay them, simply won't work hard because they're lazy af. You could offer a dude, "Hey, I'll pay you $100 if you spend 2 hours doing this translation job" and he simply won't do it. You're gonna have to get him to do it for free, out of a sense of loyalty or friendship or finding the work interesting or whatever, because money doesn't inspire him to take action.

Or, there are certain kinds of work that are so expensive that they only way you can get those services is for free. For example, let's suppose you're getting over the loss of your girlfriend and you make your friend listen to you talk about it for 100 hours before you're finally over the bitch. If he were to charge you $100/hour for being your therapist, that would be $10,000.

Group cohesion and loyalty do however have value in a dysfunctional society since then other people may retaliate if the government turns on you and this can make authorities afraid to target anyone of said group, the issue is that the opposite can happen too "this group is dangerous and thus we need to target them".
Jews are pretty dangerous yet they don't get targeted because it would be too dangerous to target them, even though they haven't really stockpiled guns or anything. It seems that it's better to be strong than weak, even if your only power is soft power, i.e. controlling a bunch of the media and academic establishments.

If our society collapses it will be very valuable to be a part of a solid group where you can rely on each other, thus it's valuable to be in good terms with your extended family (parents, siblings, cousins, etc).
Yeah, well, they should be wanting to help family just for being closely-related whites. This stuff of saying, "Well you're the black sheep because of xyz" (e.g. the dude did something socially frowned-upon, such as voting for Trump) is some bullshit. Same deal with white friends being like that. There needs to be a certain amount of unconditional acceptance, unless the person actually stabbed his fellow whites in the back, e.g. by taking some other race's side against them.
 
Top