Why teen girls are the best girls for breeding
One prominent feminist goal is to reduce teen pregnancies as if that would be a good thing. The current dogma is to put females in schools (where they do not learn much if anything of value) instead of being able to become mothers early. Young teens are brainwashed into thinking it's somehow bad to be a teen parent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKNfs1BuySs
On "I would encourage other teens to have children" they all strongly disagreed.
On "Having a baby changed my life for the better" they all strongly agreed.
This illustrates how strong the brainwashing has been, they do not recommend it to other people even though for all of them it improved their lives. It's possible they were virtue signaling giving the politically correct answer "no we do not encourage other teens to become pregnant".
It's not just them that had a good experience with teen pregnancy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896788/
Motherhood can be a positive experience that makes sense in the lives of young women from disadvantaged backgrounds. To be effective, policy must recognize the valued social role motherhood provides for these young women. The negative long-term outcomes observed may largely be a result of their disadvantaged position within society and this should be the focus of interventions.
Girls from a young age often want to become mothers, taking care of babies. By supporting them we can make that dream a reality. Instead of dolls they will now take care of their own baby after carrying and giving birth. Having children early will allow for better bond between parent and child since the difference in age will be smaller, it will be more like a friendship relationship and better for everyone.
Early pregnancy reduces breast-cancer risk
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199327/
By becoming pregnant and having children early in life you will be able to focus on your career later, wasting your most fertile years as a female just studying things at school you will rarely/never use besides to pass tests is insanity.
In most regions, the age distribution of maternal mortality follows a J-shaped curve, with a slightly increased risk of death in adolescents as compared to women between 20 and 24 years old
In addition, adolescents in some countries were found to be at lower risk of death than women in their early 20s and even than women in all other age groups
In contrast to the overall results, the MMR for 15-19 year-olds in Tanzania was the same as for women aged 20-24, and much lower than for women aged 25 and over, indicating that there is no excess risk of maternal death associated with adolescent pregnancy.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(13)70179-7/fulltext
When no other factors are taken into account, children of teenage mothers have significantly higher odds of placement in certain special education classes and significantly higher occurrence of milder education problems, but when maternal education, marital status, poverty level, and race are controlled, the detrimental effects disappear and even some protective effects are observed.
Hence, the increased risk for educational problems and disabilities among children of teenage mothers is attributed not to the effect of young age but to the confounding influences of associated sociodemographic factors. In contrast to teen age, older maternal age has an adverse effect on a child's educational outcome regardless of whether other factors are controlled for or not.
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/154/3/212/125794
The following french study had a similar result
https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19733429/
After adjustment for confounding factors, RRs (95% confidence interval) of fetal death and anaemia were respectively 1.37 (1.09-1.70) and 1.27 (1.15-1.40) for a 16-year-old compared to a 20-year-old mother. Younger mothers had significantly decreased risks of obstetric complications (preeclampsia, caesarean section, operative vaginal delivery and post-partum haemorrhage). Higher prevalence of prematurity and low birth weight in infants born to teenagers were not attributable to young maternal age after adjustment for confounding factors.
In
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=93777 they mention:
In a study conducted in Mexico by [
37] , complications during pregnancy were estimated to be at 26 percent (%) in adult women and 10 percent (%) in adolescents (p = 0.04). However, the gestational age and birth-weight were similar in both groups. The study further revealed that birth by cesarean section was more frequent among the offspring of adult women (65% compared to 48%, p = 0.015) than in adolescents.
It is sometimes stated teen pregnancies would somehow be bad for the career, the reality is of course the opposite of that. By having children early you will be able to have your career later without interruption to have children.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219229/
The research suggests that the age at which childbearing begins is not as important as the length of time since the (most recent) birth in influencing whether or not a woman works. Having a young child consistently lowers labor force participation, whereas an early birth does not.
Of the three studies that have specifically addressed this issue, one (Koo and Bilsborrow, 1980) finds no effect of early childbearing while two studies find a weak positive effect of early childbearing on labor force participation (Hofferth et al., 1978; Card, 1979). In these studies early childbearers (female) appear to be somewhat more likely to be in the labor force 10 years after high school than later childbearers. This is probably due to several factors:
0. Since early childbearers start their families early, at 1 and 5 years after high school fewer early than later childbearers are working (Card, 1977). Ten years after high school, however, their children are older while later childbearers have just begun their families and have young children in the home. Thus the early childbearers were more likely to be working 10 years after high school in the Card study and at age 24 in the Hofferth et al. study.
1. Early childbearers may have a greater economic need to work. Never married mothers who had an early birth have a high likelihood of being employed (Haggstrom et al., 1981). In a related study Trussell and Abowd (1979) also found that among whites increasing age at first birth lowers the propensity to work by raising the wage required to attract them into the work-force.
There are sex differences in the association between early childbearing and employment. At 1 and 5 years out of high school more males in the adolescent childbearer group were working, compared to their classmates (Card, 1977). Thus for males, each parenthood leads to entrance into the labor force. However, by 11 years out, these differences had disappeared. By 11 years after high-school most non-parenting males had also completed their schooling and entered the work force so the difference disappears.
Females, in contrast, work less while they have young children in the home, but as their children mature, they return to work. Thus the timing of the birth affects when that hiatus will occur. By the mid twenties, the later childbearers are beginning their families and dropping out of the work-force while the early childbearers are reentering.
researchgate.net/profile/Fermin-Leguen/publication/238760442_Maternal_Mortality_in_Miami-Dade_County_1994-2003/links/0f317533cb6c901233000000/Maternal-Mortality-in-Miami-Dade-County-1994-2003.pdf
researchgate.net/publication/10691018_Pregnancy-Related_Mortality_Surveillance_---_United_States_1991--1999/download
I was unable to find the original source for the following:
BunnyEntendre10 wrote:
You are 100% correct. A woman’s best childbearing years are what we nowadays consider her teens. Although a mans best providing age is in his 30s. We live in a patriarchal society where our lives will be based off an average day of a man. This means we are all programmed to be providers and less nurturers (this will bite us in the ass later). Because men take so long in this modern society to become providers due to financial reasons or housing we have a set amount of time before we can make our own decisions. The problem is that males and females don’t biologically mature at the same rate when it comes to societies expectations. So while scientifically the best heterosexual relationship would be a 15 year old female and a 30 year old male, it would be INSANE in this society.
