I was just thinking about this one allegedly based and blackpilled dude

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#1
When a chick showed up to one of the forums, he was basically the only guy who didn't try very hard to hit on her, or orbit her, or whatever, and people were like, "Wow! He's so based and blackpilled!" And he used to criticize those who did hit on or orbit the chick, and say that they were bluepilled, etc.

Well, guess what, the dude was actually a married guy living with his wife and kid in the suburbs. That's why he wasn't hitting on her; it was because he was already tied down to a chick.

We don't actually know how he would've behaved if he'd been single, like the other guys on the forum. So, while he held himself as being above others who weren't as based and blackpilled in their comportment, the reality is that he was never tested like we were.

@Creamer might be the only truecel I've actually run into in the incelosphere.
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#2
Anyway, what this situation taught me was, when you become a divorced dude, you're gonna lose a lot more than your wife. You're also going to lose all those friends that you made while you were still married, because it's just not a stable situation, for a single dude to be the friend of a married dude. Eventually, it's gonna break down, e.g. in a situation like this, where the married dude holds himself as superior because he's not thirsty because he's not ALLOWED to be thirsty, given he already has a wife.

At the same time, incels don't like divorced dudes either. Nor do the PUAs like them. Divorced dudes are in the worst situation, because they don't fit in anywhere, and people are always trying to shit on them; e.g. incels will be like, "Dudes who wife up a thot deserve to get ass-raped in divorce court" or whatever. That rightly gets taken as an attack on the guy's family unit, which he's not likely to want to tolerate, even if it is just lending moral support to the enemy or whatever.
 

Oxblood

Well-known member
Messages
299
#3
I don’t like divorced guys because they always try to manipulate people. You can’t know if they are guilty or victims of circumstances. I usually am pissed off when someone try to emotionally manipulate me.
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#4
I don’t like divorced guys because they always try to manipulate people. You can’t know if they are guilty or victims of circumstances. I usually am pissed off when someone try to emotionally manipulate me.
Usually there's a certain amount of evidence, e.g. the chick changes her story repeatedly or leaves stuff in the record where she practically admits that she's just using an accusation as leverage, etc.

E.g., a lot of guys are kinda reluctant to sign for a divorce, and it takes not just a lot of social pressure (e.g. the dude's mom, people on the Internet, etc. will be telling him to sign off, if he discusses it with them), but also in a lot of cases she has to accuse him of domestic violence.

I've not only experienced that myself, but heard a chick at work once talk about that. She was saying that her husband lacked common sense, had been unemployed for almost a year, etc. And she was saying she was still waiting for him to sign off on the divorce and that she might accuse him of domestic violence if he didn't sign soon. So it seems to be just part of chick mentality to have lurking in the back of their minds, "Oh, if he doesn't cooperate, this is a card I can play to make him cooperate."

Divorced guys often don't have another chick to move on to, or if they do, she's probably just going to use him and then dump him, leaving him in pretty much the same situation as before, so it's no wonder they have trouble putting pen to that paper, which represents a definitive end to the relationship, and breaking up whatever family they had, etc.
 
Last edited:
Top