Kinda interesting how the Beatles used to downplay the importance of love

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#1
Saying love is all you need, money can't buy love, etc.

Well, I guess Paul McCartney found that out the hard way, when he got frivorce-raped pretty badly. If his chick could just take his money, then she wouldn't stick around with him.

On the other hand, if she hadn't needed to marry him to get his money, he probably wouldn't have even gotten as far as he did, in that sense. She was willing to jump through whatever hoops were needed to get at that money, which could include acting loving and maybe even mindfucking herself into believing she loved him, in order to more convincingly play the part.

Also, we see that when an attractive dude doesn't have money, a chick may have his kids, but won't stay with him and let him raise those kids with her. He'll only get to see them on weekends or whatever. It's not an ideal situation, and doesn't really reflect a complete love. Yeah, he gets freed from the financial obligations of taking care of the kids (although if he'd take those on, she'd probably let him back into the relationship), and he gets some free sex, briefly, but that's about it. After she has the kid, she'll go into her mode of wanting to trade sex for provisioning since she already got the Chad genetics she wanted from the badboy.

The reality is that if you want love from a chick that's both (1) sexual and passionate, and (2) makes her actually want to stay around, you need to speak her love languages, which includes being both physically attractive and buying her a bunch of stuff. So really, it just depends on what kind of love you're looking for, and if you can keep her from draining your wallet without giving you anything in return, cuz once she gains the ability to do that, she doesn't really need to offer you anything anymore.
 
Top