- Messages
- 916
When I appealed to the 10th Circuit, they issued this long opinion: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20101115049 When I appealed to the 4th Circuit, the issued this shorter opinion: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-larson-12
It makes me more inclined to not want to appeal in the 4th Circuit, because they just quickly dismiss cases without doing a lot of analysis, so all that work you put into it just boils down to something kinda brief that doesn't really do much to advance our knowledge of the judges' thinking via what they're putting into the body of case law. It's hard to really quote them in future cases, or try to point out errors in their thinking, because they're just not saying a lot.
The French Court of Cassation doesn't really issue long decisions. They issue like a one-page decision. So for example, they would condense down the lengthy opinion in Obergefell:
The more you argue with someone, the more you probably are going to make at some point some bad arguments, or give them some other ammunition to use against you. Now, it could be that they at least say, "He gave me my due," but probably that will just encourage them to argue with you more in the future, because they see that you'll respond to it. An appellate court that issues lengthy decisions like that will probably end up encouraging litigants to file more appeals because they feel like, because they got such a long opinion in response, their positions were taken into careful consideration which means they were perhaps kinda close to getting their way.
Some say that with females, you simply shouldn't argue with them much, because they'll try to wear you down with filibustering and ultimately these arguments just have to be settled with force anyway. If you're in a position of equal power, the relationship is not gonna work because you'll deadlock; it isn't like a situation with two men where you can find a way to make the pie bigger rather than fighting over slices of the pie. Chicks pretty much just wanna feed off of men's accomplishments rather than collaborating all that much to increase their accomplishments.
It makes me more inclined to not want to appeal in the 4th Circuit, because they just quickly dismiss cases without doing a lot of analysis, so all that work you put into it just boils down to something kinda brief that doesn't really do much to advance our knowledge of the judges' thinking via what they're putting into the body of case law. It's hard to really quote them in future cases, or try to point out errors in their thinking, because they're just not saying a lot.
The French Court of Cassation doesn't really issue long decisions. They issue like a one-page decision. So for example, they would condense down the lengthy opinion in Obergefell:
The more you argue with someone, the more you probably are going to make at some point some bad arguments, or give them some other ammunition to use against you. Now, it could be that they at least say, "He gave me my due," but probably that will just encourage them to argue with you more in the future, because they see that you'll respond to it. An appellate court that issues lengthy decisions like that will probably end up encouraging litigants to file more appeals because they feel like, because they got such a long opinion in response, their positions were taken into careful consideration which means they were perhaps kinda close to getting their way.
Some say that with females, you simply shouldn't argue with them much, because they'll try to wear you down with filibustering and ultimately these arguments just have to be settled with force anyway. If you're in a position of equal power, the relationship is not gonna work because you'll deadlock; it isn't like a situation with two men where you can find a way to make the pie bigger rather than fighting over slices of the pie. Chicks pretty much just wanna feed off of men's accomplishments rather than collaborating all that much to increase their accomplishments.