- Messages
- 916
Any time a chick breaks up with a dude, she's usually going to take the opportunity to shit on him somewhat. E.g., she might tell him, "By the way, I was cheating on you," kinda like in Office Space. Or she might try to destroy his confidence and pride, e.g. by telling him, "By the way, your penis is small." Or they may lay a huge guilt trip on him, and blame him for the relationship's failure, to mindfuck him, so that he goes around kicking himself, if he accepts her interpretation of events. Maybe she'll also try to manipulate the divorce proceedings (if applicable) by accusing him of rape.
On the other hand, if a dude gives a chick a piece of his mind at the close of the relationship, that's considered harassment. And if he tries to counter what she's doing in court by threatening her, using whatever leverage he might happen to have, that of course is considered abusive, controlling behavior. E.g. if he tries to withhold money, that's financial abuse, and courts may order him to hand over that money for her benefit, so as to "equalize" the power between them.
If he complains about being treated this way, people will say, "You chose her" or "We warned you about getting with that kind of chick." People would never say that to a chick; they would never say to a bettered chick, "You chose him" or "Society has been saying for a long time to avoid these red flags of an abusive guy, plus you had many opportunities to get with a nicer guy and you rejected them." That would be considered blaming the victim, and the person blaming her would be considered a misogynist.
Basically we're getting close to having a state of war between the sexes. And why shouldn't there be? "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism", it is our right to throw them off. That's basically what's happening.
And no, we can't just go MGTOW, because these foids are everywhere. I can't even really hang out on Wikipedia or other online communities without finding that foids have taken over and sought to eject "misogynists". Or, we run into problems with guys hating on anyone who's ever been more romantically successful than them; Zesto wrecked our server because he wanted to please GameDev and Vergil, who in turn were against me because they wanted Florelle. By syllogism, it happened because of Florelle. Likewise, I was kicked out of .co partly because they didn't like I'd been more successful than some of them.
Something needs to be done, and the first step is to quit siding with these chicks. But it's easy to side with them, because they make it sound like they're being the vulnerable and reasonable one who's afraid of some raging dude, without regard to the fact that maybe the dude has reason to rage. Yeah right; you can take any chick who seems like she's cute and sweet and doesn't have a malicious bone in her body, and if you expose her communications, her girltalk, or whatnot, you find, she's quite capable of putting in the shiv at an opportune time and place. They know how to manipulate because it's how they survive, and the "girly" behavior is mostly a front. Doesn't matter how much they cry or act weak or fearful or sensitive, or how calm and reasonable or even likeable they may seem at certain times, when that seems to them like the optimal way to get what they want. At the end of the day, they are capable of hurting you, and probably causing more pain than you'd ever be likely to cause them, being the nice guy you are.
Ironically, the ones who are truly nice, are probably not the ones who are going to go out of their way to get revenge, and usually they're the ones who are a lot younger and inexperienced. But it can be really hard to tell which is which, and ultimately they all have their malicious and selfish and dishonest potential, which society is fine with allowing, while they hold men to a much higher standard.
So, what to do in response to this? It's gonna be tough, because the feminists and their Jewish allies and their other white knights control the universities and the media and a lot of the courts. We have to try to work around them as best we can, is all I can think of, unless we want to -- oh wait, I can't talk about the other option here, never mind.
On the other hand, if a dude gives a chick a piece of his mind at the close of the relationship, that's considered harassment. And if he tries to counter what she's doing in court by threatening her, using whatever leverage he might happen to have, that of course is considered abusive, controlling behavior. E.g. if he tries to withhold money, that's financial abuse, and courts may order him to hand over that money for her benefit, so as to "equalize" the power between them.
If he complains about being treated this way, people will say, "You chose her" or "We warned you about getting with that kind of chick." People would never say that to a chick; they would never say to a bettered chick, "You chose him" or "Society has been saying for a long time to avoid these red flags of an abusive guy, plus you had many opportunities to get with a nicer guy and you rejected them." That would be considered blaming the victim, and the person blaming her would be considered a misogynist.
Basically we're getting close to having a state of war between the sexes. And why shouldn't there be? "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism", it is our right to throw them off. That's basically what's happening.
And no, we can't just go MGTOW, because these foids are everywhere. I can't even really hang out on Wikipedia or other online communities without finding that foids have taken over and sought to eject "misogynists". Or, we run into problems with guys hating on anyone who's ever been more romantically successful than them; Zesto wrecked our server because he wanted to please GameDev and Vergil, who in turn were against me because they wanted Florelle. By syllogism, it happened because of Florelle. Likewise, I was kicked out of .co partly because they didn't like I'd been more successful than some of them.
Something needs to be done, and the first step is to quit siding with these chicks. But it's easy to side with them, because they make it sound like they're being the vulnerable and reasonable one who's afraid of some raging dude, without regard to the fact that maybe the dude has reason to rage. Yeah right; you can take any chick who seems like she's cute and sweet and doesn't have a malicious bone in her body, and if you expose her communications, her girltalk, or whatnot, you find, she's quite capable of putting in the shiv at an opportune time and place. They know how to manipulate because it's how they survive, and the "girly" behavior is mostly a front. Doesn't matter how much they cry or act weak or fearful or sensitive, or how calm and reasonable or even likeable they may seem at certain times, when that seems to them like the optimal way to get what they want. At the end of the day, they are capable of hurting you, and probably causing more pain than you'd ever be likely to cause them, being the nice guy you are.
Ironically, the ones who are truly nice, are probably not the ones who are going to go out of their way to get revenge, and usually they're the ones who are a lot younger and inexperienced. But it can be really hard to tell which is which, and ultimately they all have their malicious and selfish and dishonest potential, which society is fine with allowing, while they hold men to a much higher standard.
So, what to do in response to this? It's gonna be tough, because the feminists and their Jewish allies and their other white knights control the universities and the media and a lot of the courts. We have to try to work around them as best we can, is all I can think of, unless we want to -- oh wait, I can't talk about the other option here, never mind.
