So what would've been wrong with Bloomberg telling a pregnant employee, "Kill it"

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#1
https://www.businessinsider.com/bloomberg-asked-a-pregnant-employee-going-to-kill-it-2020-2

What's the big deal, just that it would've been a comment directed at a woman, that a man wouldn't have been subjected to, because men don't get pregnant; and thus, therefore the comment is discriminatory?

Well, that's kinda like discriminating against me for having a criminal record; men are much more likely than women to have criminal records, yet nobody cares if we're treated like shit for having a rap sheet.

One might say, "Yeah, but you CHOSE to commit crimes." True, but I didn't choose to be a man, and have that increased likelihood of being a criminal, any more than she chose to be a woman, and therefore have a uterus, and thus an increased likelihood that her employee would view her pregnancy as a burden (theoretically, a father could also be distracted from his job by stuff going on with his kids, but in practice, it's usually moms who have to leave early, come in late, skip work, etc. to take care of their kids). Also, she probably chose to engage in unprotected sex as well, which resulted in getting pregnant.

If he says "Kill it," maybe that's just a suggestion, anyhow. Did he tell her she had to kill it? Maybe it was just a joke; is it really that big a deal. So he tells a joke that someone doesn't like. Does it make him a misogynist?

But, he says he simply didn't say it, which could quit possibly be true. Or maybe he asked her, "Are you going to kill it," which, in this day and age, quite a lot of women do. In fact, killing it is considered a human right, so what's the big deal about him asking her, "Are you going to exercise your human right to kill it?" After all, we want to destigmatize abortion, right? How better to destigmatize it than to go around telling women, "Kill it!" so they realize they have the moral support of their culture in making such a decision? Thus, Bloomberg should be saluted by white knights as a defender of feminism.

If he says, "Kill it," he's just encouraging her to be a strong, independent woman who puts career first rather than letting kids get in the way; how could any women's rights advocate find that offensive? Having kids, especially a large number of kids, has historically hindered women in their careers, and all he would have been doing was saying, "C'mon, don't let this get in the way of your advancement; you have a whole generation of ambitious young women who look up to you and you let them down if you focus on family instead of being focused on work every bit as a much as a man would be."
 

Creamer

Well-known member
Messages
935
#2
low iq on his part talking anything nonwork related with a foid, but him being an ugly rich white man
this type o shit would have happened anyways.

looks like she faux flirted him or he got sick of the diversity hired parasites.

I dont give a fuck what happens to her larva tbh.
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#3
low iq on his part talking anything nonwork related with a foid, but him being an ugly rich white man
this type o shit would have happened anyways.

looks like she faux flirted him or he got sick of the diversity hired parasites.

I dont give a fuck what happens to her larva tbh.
Too bad to see Bloomberg out of the race; I guess he didn't feel like getting used as Warren's punching bag anymore at these debates.
 

Admin

Administrator
Moderator
Messages
4,377
#4
This really illustrates another shortcoming with capitalism, females are being punished for doing what need to be done in terms or making babies, the result will be disastrous fertility rate.

The sin of bloomberg was to point out the reality of the situation, he just made it too obvious and this is his crime.

The fertility rate continued to drop under Trump (as expected).

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/fertility-rate
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#5
This really illustrates another shortcoming with capitalism, females are being punished for doing what need to be done in terms or making babies, the result will be disastrous fertility rate.

The sin of bloomberg was to point out the reality of the situation, he just made it too obvious and this is his crime.

The fertility rate continued to drop under Trump (as expected).

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/fertility-rate
Well, if a man were to say, "To feel fulfilled as a man, I need to go on a sabbatical to Tibet" or "I have to serve my country by joining the Reserves and going on deployment to Iraq" might not his employer be like, "That's not good for the company, and it's not good for your career either"?

I once accepted a job offer, but had already been appointed as a delegate to the Libertarian National Convention once. My co-worker who referred for the job I'd accepted, when I told him about my planned trip, said, "they may frown upon that" because it was going to delay my start date at the company. So, I cancelled my trip.

But, I could've argued, "I want to do my civic duty and participate in politics." How is that really different from a chick saying, "I want to fulfill my role as a woman and have kids" even though she has a workplace that depends on her being there?

The main exception besides maternity that people will accept for being out of the workplace is if you have a RELIGIOUS sabbatical to go on, like wanting to travel to Mecca, but even then, they'd probably secretly resent the inconvenience if they don't share your religion.
 

Admin

Administrator
Moderator
Messages
4,377
#6
How is that really different from a chick saying, "I want to fulfill my role as a woman and have kids" even though she has a workplace that depends on her being there?
Females are not given a clear message that it's important that they have children, instead the message is "we are overpopulated" in addition to the fact that we dont live in a good society and there is no indication things will change to the better.
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#7
Females are not given a clear message that it's important that they have children, instead the message is "we are overpopulated" in addition to the fact that we dont live in a good society and there is no indication things will change to the better.
Yeah, it's kinda funny how that works; if you tell a white chick about the birth rate, she'll say, "the world is overpopulated anyway" as a way of seeming socially responsible and as though she's doing her part by NOT having kids.

Yeah, the world may be overpopulated by a bunch of Africans and Arabs. You'll never hear an African or Arab chick say, "The world is overpopulated, so I shouldn't have kids." Nor will you hear a Latina say that. This is because their religion and culture teach that they should have as many kids as nature permits; they don't have a secular religion of environmentalism that teaches about overpopulation.

If a nonwhite woman raises any concern about having kids, it'll be that she and/or her husband can't afford it. But in Africa, usually the woman still wants to have several kids, even if she's poor, although her husband will typically want even more kids than she does.
 
Top