- Messages
- 916
Apparently she's having trouble reaching the donation thresholds needed to get into the December debate. I did donate $1 to Andrew Yang's campaign to get him into the debates, and I had my mom donate $1 to Tulsi to help her too, but I'm reluctant to help either of them out any further.
They've both already said everything they need to say. Yang put forth his UBI idea, and Gabbard put forward her opposition to regime change wars. They really have nothing else to say. They were meme candidates.
Gabbard is one of these chicks who just likes to talk about her credentials and qualifications a lot. E.g., she's served on this and that committee. Okay, but what are her actual accomplishments; what has she actually done to improve our lives?
Her arguments against regime change wars would seem more compelling if Trump were going around invading other countries, but he isn't. So there's really nothing about her that would make her seem better than Trump, other than that she's probably more in favor of pot legalization than he is. On other issues, like women's issues, she's probably worse than Trump.
And we simply shouldn't have a female commander-in-chief. There's a theoretical possibility that if her campaign keeps going long enough and she picks up enough momentum, maybe she'll be on the Democratic ticket as their VP candidate, and ultimately ascend to the presidency. We don't really want that.
They've both already said everything they need to say. Yang put forth his UBI idea, and Gabbard put forward her opposition to regime change wars. They really have nothing else to say. They were meme candidates.
Gabbard is one of these chicks who just likes to talk about her credentials and qualifications a lot. E.g., she's served on this and that committee. Okay, but what are her actual accomplishments; what has she actually done to improve our lives?
Her arguments against regime change wars would seem more compelling if Trump were going around invading other countries, but he isn't. So there's really nothing about her that would make her seem better than Trump, other than that she's probably more in favor of pot legalization than he is. On other issues, like women's issues, she's probably worse than Trump.
And we simply shouldn't have a female commander-in-chief. There's a theoretical possibility that if her campaign keeps going long enough and she picks up enough momentum, maybe she'll be on the Democratic ticket as their VP candidate, and ultimately ascend to the presidency. We don't really want that.
