The judge told me back in 2009, basically, "It doesn't matter how smart you are; the fact remains, you threatened the President."

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#1
(Actually, the way he phrased it was along the lines of, you may be the smartest person in the room, but that doesn't really matter because you're also the only person in this room who's in custody.)

I could make the same argument back to intelligent normies, "It doesn't matter how smart you are; the fact remains, you DIDN'T threaten the President."

Some people would say, "You took everything you had (college education, potential career, etc.) and threw it away by threatening the President, since that's a felony that's gonna be on your record forever and keep any reputable employer from wanting to hire you."

I could also argue it was my finest hour, though. Most people will never write a letter to the President saying, "You need to die because x, y, and z" and put all the writing skills they learned in school and from practicing on their own, and all of the logic and facts they've picked up from their study of politics and economics, to use in writing that letter.

As it happens, the letter basically got shoahed; even when I posted it here, it was taken down, and when it came time for the newspapers to print stories about how I'd threatened the President, they didn't have access to a copy of the letter, so they weren't able to really say anything about its contents, except for the first sentence. It was that powerful of a document, that it had to be suppressed.

Doesn't do much good to have intelligence if you don't have any balls. It's so rare for anyone to have the balls to openly commit an act like that, that will result in their spending four years in prison (as I did), that few will do it. That's what makes those are willing to do it, special.

What are you going to do with your intelligence, since you're not threatening the President? Die in obscurity? Probably.

We know that you're not going to get with any decent chick, because those are pretty hard to find these days, and by the time they've reached the age at which it's legal for you to have sex with them, they've generally already sucked off, if not gotten fucked by, some other dudes, so you're getting secondhand goods.

Thoreau had a point when he said, "Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison." It was as true then as it is now.

He also said, "If I devote myself to other pursuits and contemplations, I must first see, at least, that I do not pursue them sitting upon another man's shoulders. I must get off him first, that he may pursue his contemplations too." That's also as true now as it was then.

Vintologi would say, seek power and use it however you want; fuck morality and fuck the weak. Okay, well, where's your power? It turns out you're actually the weak who are getting fucked, both now and for the foreseeable future. So, you're not any better than me, really.

And neither really is the typical normie. Thoreau was also observant to note, "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation." What is desperation? "A state of despair, typically one which results in rash or extreme behavior." Yeah, it's pretty rash and extreme to just sit around letting your life go by, seeing how fucked up the world is and not fighting back against those who are making it that way, even through some token gesture like threatening the President.
 
Last edited:

deon

Well-known member
Messages
102
#2
This world is insane, and it will pull us into the pits of hell with it.
The 'sane' ones remaining to adjust, scrap by and forge order from insanity.
while the insane do the complete upset, even with all of the grey areas in between.
 
Last edited:

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#3
Another thing that my lawyer said in an effort to try to get the judge to be lenient was that in his observation, I often didn't really mean the threatening stuff I said, but was just trying to feel like the smartest person in the room.

The judge's response to that was to say that it seemed like I had contempt for those around me, and that therefore he needed to give me a harsher sentence to make sure I got the message that no matter where one lives, one needs to abide by certain norms in order to accommodate the fact that there are other people in the world.

Basically everything my lawyer tried to raise as a mitigating factor, the judge ended up using as an aggravating factor.

A lot of times, if you have a political case, it's better just to not let your lawyer speak on your behalf at all, because lawyers aren't really trained in how to handle such cases. All they know how to do in most such situations is claim that you're simply crazy and that's why you broke the law in an effort to make a political point; and it ends up undermining the whole purpose of having committed the crime, without helping their client get less prison time. That's what they did with Ted Kaczynski, Dylann Roof, and many others -- against their clients' wishes, they tried to hint that their client was crazy.

With Timothy McVeigh, the lawyer brought up a bunch of implausible conspiracy theories about how it could've been someone like Osama bin Laden who bombed the building. It didn't help.

My lawyer basically hated me, and even said twice, as I was being taken away to prison, "I hope I never see you again," which I think was a purposeful double entendre.

Any time you have a lawyer who's trying to tell you that you're fucked up in the head, that you need counseling, that you need to understand why your crime was wrong, etc., you probably need to fire that lawyer, because he's basically wanting to argue the state's case, that you're a threat to society that needs to be managed, probably by restricting your freedom in some way or another and making you undergo some kind of treatment.
 
Last edited:
Top