So what do you think about the case of Jokestress, aka Andrea James

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_James

Her playing the tranny card didn't work out too well, huh? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology#Amendment_Request_(November_2019)

Read through the case and you'll see that there are a lot of limitations on how much protection one gets by claiming a transgender identity. It's not like being born with a pussy, where you automatically gain a bunch of solidarity from fellow women, and no one is allowed to be an advocate for the other side without being considered misogynistic or just another divorced loser or angry incel or whatever.

Flyer22 was able to push back against pro-tranny political correctness by claiming that anti-pedo political correctness was more important, and the arbitrators took her side. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology#Statement_by_Flyer22_Reborn

Basically the only extra right that being trans gets you, is the right to be called by your new name and your preferred pronoun. See, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-10-16/Arbitration_report It doesn't mean you get afforded the whole panoply of rights that women get.

I guess maybe you get to use a woman's bathroom, but if anything, that's a step backward because there's probably a longer line for it.

When I think back to the Blackpill.is days, a tranny simply would not have been able to have the power that Florelle or even Dahlia had. A pro-pedo tranny is also not going to be treated as well as that one pedoslut, ah fuck, what was her name, the one e-slut who I think worked for some major corporation briefly and used to defend pedophilia online? I think she had a Dramatica and/or Lolcow Wiki article, but both wikis are gone now? Fuck, if I could remember the company, I could probably find her. Anyway, being pro-pedo is not going to hurt her SMV at all.
 

Admin

Administrator
Moderator
Messages
4,374
#2
If you become too controversial as transexual other trannies will turn on you because you are viewed as a liability, that's what happened to jessica yaniv. You are expected to be a decent representative for transgender individuals and not give them a bad name.

You dont really have that as a cis female since you are born with it.

But even as a cis girl people will still turn on you if you get too out of line, nobody is really safe these days.
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#3
If you become too controversial as transexual other trannies will turn on you because you are viewed as a liability, that's what happened to jessica yaniv. You are expected to be a decent representative for transgender individuals and not give them a bad name.

You dont really have that as a cis female since you are born with it.

But even as a cis girl people will still turn on you if you get too out of line, nobody is really safe these days.
Who's an example of a cis girl who was turned against? How would anyone even turn against her? They can't slut-shame her or anything like that. They can't say they disbelieve her rape accusations. So what's left, as a way by which they could turn against her?
 

Admin

Administrator
Moderator
Messages
4,374
#4
Who's an example of a cis girl who was turned against? How would anyone even turn against her? They can't slut-shame her or anything like that. They can't say they disbelieve her rape accusations. So what's left, as a way by which they could turn against her?
There was a women crying on dr phil after the government took her kids, she had them with an escaped felon, it seems like her mother essentially stole the kids from her for some reason, her mother claimed she got psychotic due to adderal when he broke down over losing her children. There are many cases of females losing custody over kids, children are prioritized over the well-being of adult females.

There are also plenty of cis females victims of psychiatry and this includes treating them against their will with harmful psychiatric drugs.
 

Leucosticte

Well-known member
Messages
916
#5
There was a women crying on dr phil after the government took her kids, she had them with an escaped felon, it seems like her mother essentially stole the kids from her for some reason, her mother claimed she got psychotic due to adderal when he broke down over losing her children. There are many cases of females losing custody over kids, children are prioritized over the well-being of adult females.

There are also plenty of cis females victims of psychiatry and this includes treating them against their will with harmful psychiatric drugs.
Both of those examples are true, although what's even more common than involuntary treatment is that chicks will willingly submit to psychiatry.

Yeah, women's fear of losing their kids is a major way by which society maintains leverage over them, although men will lose their kids even more easily than women will.

One of the few "advantages" that evangelical Christians still hold in today's society is that they get to take other people's kids and raise them in their own culture, although that's also a form of cuckoldry, so it's really like they're getting double-cucked -- first by their religion (which makes them donate money to support others' families) and then by the badboy who impregnated some psycho or drug-addicted chick who ended up having her kids taken away by the psychiatrists, courts, etc.

Adopted kids start to resemble their adoptive parents, so it's kind of hard to say who's getting cucked more by the situation. Maybe some DNA switches on or off depending on environment, so the biological father is not even getting the full benefit of having contributed his DNA, in terms of perpetuating his phenotype.
 
Top