My political views

[Admin]

The way i evaluate policies is to look at what will actually work out long-term for humanity as a whole. I do believe that every consciousness is eternal and that our current lives are just one of infinitely many. I hope that the life i am currently living on earth will not be the only one.

So fundamentally i do not actually believe in things like liberty, equality or democracy as goal of themselves. I prefer an unequal society if the average quality of life is higher, note that "quality of life" also includes people also being happy with how the country is governed, it's not just about material assets.

 

[Admin]

Societal survival of the fittest
I believe that the competition between societies will push states to implement increasingly inhumane policies in order to remain competitive. That can be people (mostly males) being forced into military service or females being forced to make babies so the state can later have more cannon fodder in wars.

Sates will also be pushed to neglect the environment in favor of remaining competitive since crippling your own economy with green policies will make it a lot easier for other states to invade you (making those green policies almost counter-productive).

This will continue until we have a stable world government.

It's only when we are in control of a world government that we can start to properly actually make society better long-term for humanity instead of having to constantly choose between what's comfortable in the moment and what will make society competitive against other competing states.

 

[Admin]

Authoritarianism
It's pretty obvious that authoritarian governance has a lot better potential than democratic governance and that over time there will be convergence towards authoritarianism.

I expect all democratic states to eventually be conquered or transform into authoritarian states from within due to democracy being inherently unstable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_backsliding

If democracy isn't going to work anyway our focus should be to maximize the chance of good people ending up with the power rather than the worst.

https://vintologi.com/threads/elite-rule.24/

Unfortunately i cannot think of any particular reliable way to actually end up with good people at the top when democracy ends, seems like luck will be required for that. One approach that could work is via intermediate forms of governance where the plan is having it converge towards proper pure elite rule.

 

[Admin]

The value of someones well-being shouldn't be dictated by chromosomes or birth sex
Policy should not be centered around just one of the sexes ignoring around half of the population.

But i am worried about males becoming largely obsolete once they are no longer needed as cannon fodder i wars or as workers to support the economy.

One radical approach is to replace the Y chromosome with an engineered chromosome, this may allow humanity to share the same chromosomes (XZ) instead of today where most people have XX or XY (rare intersex exception exists of course).

https://vintologi.com/threads/hermaphrodism.882/

Until we are there we have to resort to other tools such as medical transition to allow people to live better lives as females.

People being able to transition and transcend nature is a very important step in the right direction. By going against the "natural biology" (whatever that is) we can allow people to live better lives instead of for example slowly dying of cancer.

It's here important to recognize that gender roles are in fact biological and not merely a social construct, for that reason we have to look for medical solution to fix the biology itself rather than merely trying to change social norms.

https://www.reddit.com/r/transmaxxing/comments/ursybb/debunking_sex_and_gender_are_2_separate_things/

 

[Admin]

Not having to wait to like 25 to have sex
Having a strong sex drive from puberty but being unable to actually have any sexual experiences until say 25 is very much not a good experience and also not something we need people to go through in the first place.

We need to have social structure and laws that does allow people to have good sexual experiences early in life instead of people having bad experiences or remaining celibate.

People should not have to worry about getting an STD or going to jail because the your girlfriend was only 15 years and 11 months old with AoC being 16 (common in western countries). Those AoC laws are based on what's politically popular at the time completely ignoring the bad consequences they have especially on young people.

high age of consent laws are often justified using pseudoscience "the brain isn't fully developed until 25".

Reality: teens are very much able to make decisions for themselves

https://vintologi.com/threads/age-and-mental-abilities.1105/

If anything people tend to get dumber as the age past the age of 25 but we do not see laws making it rape to have sex with an elderly female or someone who is simply dumb.

Sex is a natural human need from puberty and people should be able to experience that at least from age 14 (if not earlier).

I do not see much problems with having significant age differences in relationships (such as age 14 and 30) besides the general concern of young males ending up sex-less due to females of their age opting for older males.

People should also be able to become parents early in life and be supported by society at large for it. This is especially important for females since early pregnancy reduced the breast-cancer risk.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199327/

https://vintologi.com/threads/teen-sex.20/#post-193

 

[Admin]

Securing a good future for humanity long-term
Currently a big focus for politicians is focusing on the elderly who don't have much time left to live and they tend to ignore the long-term consequences of their elections since that will mainly be the problem later on when they are probably not even in office anymore.

We need to focus more on the wellbeing on young people and deprioritize the elderly, for that we need to abandon democracy in general or at least severely restrict voting past the age of 45.

https://www.futurebudget.org/

But more importantly we need to focus more on the future of humanity as a whole even when we we have all died. In my case a significant reason for that is that i view consciousness as fundamentally eternal and i believe that i will eventually experience live as a human on earth again if we take care of our future and prevent humans from eventually going extinct.

 

[Admin]

Not letting AI or anything else non-human dominate us
We cannot trust people who are not aligned with us on a genetic level to properly govern us.

There is no way to properly align AI with the goals of humanity and for safety reasons we need to take drastic measures to ensure that humans will be in control of over planet for the remaining duration of its habitability.

There are types of technology that are too dangerous to hand to the typical citizen. We wouldn't want to give randos access to nuclear weapons and AI is even more dangerous than what nukes are.

 

[Admin]

Not becoming dependent on technology.
It's very important that humanity is able to survive even if all technology where to disappear overnight. This does not mean that we should go back to primitivism, in fact we are trying to avoid that but it should still be there as an option in the case of a massive technological collapse.

This should extent to healthcare. The fewer people who needs treatment for survival and reproduction the better.

This should be a factor when it comes to breeding. If a female has a genetic health issue then she probably should not be subjected to any forced breeding. When we have a single world government we might eventually need a one-child policy to apply to people ill-suited for reproduction.

 

[Admin]

Disease eradication
It's especially important that we are able to get rid of infectious diseases.

I want a society where people are able to freely interact with each other without having to worry about infectious diseases, especially when it comes to sex.

A lot of people needlessly died of aids due to the government not taking proper measures against the spread of HIV, things like that has to stop.

 

[Admin]

Central bank digital currency is a very good thing
We shouldn't let foreign companies/governments be in control of our payment infrastructure.

The best option is likely to have the payment infrastructure be directly controlled by the central bank.

Central bank digital currency would also allow people to have money directly in a central bank account rather than being forced to risk their money by depositing on a commercial bank to access convenient payment methods.

"CDBC will be used for bad things"

Said 'bad' things can be done by a government without CDBC.

It's to enable free (or much cheaper) legal payments, it's obviously not meant for criminal activities. If you are a criminal you should obviously look at things like cash and crypto instead.

 

[Creamer]

Not letting AI or anything else non-human dominate us ?
it can't be worse than the elites. at least an objective AI will let us breed.

Not becoming dependent on technology.
turn off the power and most modern cities will collapse into chaos.
IG you should gain some foraging skills.

"A lot of people needlessly died of aids due to the government not taking proper measures against the spread of HIV, things like that has to stop. " HIV is only transmitted via butt sex for the butt side.

CDBC will let the gov tell you what and how much you can buy, as well as cripple you financially if you have discerning views.

 

[Admin]

CDBC will let the gov tell you what and how much you can buy, as well as cripple you financially if you have discerning views.

Honestly i think that's mainly fear-mongering pushed by corporations like mastercard. They want to have that power for themselves.

The government doesn't need CBDC to freeze your bank account, they can already do that. They can also confiscate cash from you as well if they find that. Even if you are somehow able to hide the wealth from them that doesn't really help much if you are stuck in a concentration camp.

 

[Admin]

but they have to coordinate that with several banks.
CBDC would be easier for them.

So far payment systems controlled the central banks have engaged in far less censorship than private payment systems.

In fact i am not aware of any central bank payment system being weaponized against anything that isn't outright illegal (often they don't even stop illegal payments).

Most people trust the central bank more than companies like paypal as they should. Why do you think brazil have "powered by Banco Central" under the logo? obviously they know that it will make people in general more prone to trusting it.

 

[Admin]

Having people and corporations serve the state
There is nothing wrong with some people being expected to serve society even if it isn't what they personally want to do.

It can be males being expected and required to participate in wars (or older infertile females).

It can be females being expected and required to get pregnant to give birth. This will especially be the case for females with genetics valuable for society and is appropriate as long as she remains able to give birth without any major complications.

While serving society when you don't want to can be unpleasant and dangerous it can also be exciting. You might not want it at first but often you end up liking it eventually as you are pushed into it.

Corporations should be expected to serve society as a whole and not the other way around. Sure they will be allowed to make a profit for themselves but they will have to share some of that with the state and they shouldn't expect the state to bail them out during hardships or be able to lobby/bribe politicians to benefit them at the expensive of their competition.

No corporation should be considered "too big to fail". If what they do is critical for society as a whole it can simply be taken over by the state (such as having the government buy up the assets after bankruptcy).

 

[Admin]

Regarding government-run businesses
A component government will also be able to successfully run businesses but the ability to do so well will be limited since running a business properly take effort and the people governing a country will also have a lot of other things to focus on.

So even a component government might have to sell off some businesses due the people in the people in government having more important issues to focus on than that business.

You can let candidates for positions of authority to first manage a state-own company to prove their competence before they are given authority over the entire country.

 

[Admin]

Pedophilic disorder is bad by itself
Often when people hate on pedophiles they focus on things like children being harmed ignoring the fact that pedophilic disorder is bad by itself merely from promoting unhealthy body ideals such as females with no breasts. A pedophile might for example find an undeveloped 18 year old female attracted due to hear lacking any real breasts, etc but that's not something we should normalize in any way.

https://vintologi.com/threads/about-pedophilia.2673

There is no good way to be a pedophile, all you can do is what's least bad for society which is still bad.

Instead we should try to find genes responsible for pedophilic disorder and breed them out of the gene-pool and try to find effective treatments for people who already have pedophilic disorder.

 

[Admin]

Feminism is societal cancer
"societal cancer" refers to something growing and gaining influence while also being bad to the point where it will eventually destroy the host-society if it's not properly eliminated in timed.

Feminism does for example result in catastrophically bad birth-rates due to feminists pushing females to have careers and they oppose teen girls becoming pregnant obviously.

What makes the situation even worse is that the resulting fertility rate is even worse among the females most suited for breeding resulting in dysgenic breeding over-all. There is now no easy fix for this, economic incentives will not work, only physical force will now solve the problem. Had we acted earlier then perhaps more liberal methods could have worked but it's now far too late for that.

Feminism is in favor of females being promoted into positions of authority they are ill-suited for at the expense of better suited males and society as a whole.

Feminism also opposes all forms of gender roles/expectations (even basic healthy ones) and that is especially bad for trans people since it prevents them from effectively and legitimately communicating to others which gender they currently belong to due to feminists having destroyed all those norms to the point where everything is being determined by birth characteristics and possibly unscientific assessment by doctor (in intersex cases).

Having things like well developed breasts as a female should be the norm and we should not try to normalize anything else.

TERF ideology is indeed the true form of feminism when it's distilled to the pure evil it is without anything redeeming wrongly attached to it. It's also in line with the second wave of feminism which also happened to be anti-trans similar to modern TERF ideology.