The political 'right' is full of gifters and charlatons

[Admin]

A general problem i have noticed with politics is that people often gain a following by catering to an existing audience rather than actually leading.
This is especially prevalent in the US where people cater to religious insanity (like christian fundamentalism) because a lot of people want to believe in that.
Jordan Peterson: christian rather figure who ended up in a russian rehab

https://vintologi.com/threads/refuting-jordan-peterson.334

Donald Trump: would adjust his rhetoric based on the reactions he got from his audience and lies constantly. Wants to be a dictator but lacks a bit in competence, might become a dictator anyway.

https://vintologi.com/threads/looks-like-the-us-is-becoming-a-dictatorship-as-expected.3527/

And its not like the non-populists are better since that consists of nazis and libertarians (and weird mixes between the 2).

https://vintologi.com/threads/debunking-libertarianism.2586/

https://vintologi.com/threads/about-political-ideologies.926/#post-5316

 

[Admin]

Anti-trans bullshit
Because a lot of US conservatives don't like trans people the various conservative talking heads will come up with bullshit arguments against it because that's what their audience wants to hear. That in turn makes them even more against trans people in a rather destructive spiral.

Charlie Kirk did for example make a big deal about trans shooters even though trans people in general are very much underrepresented when it came to those crimes. Him getting shot was definitely bad since that will result in his garbage ideology becoming more popular and him becoming some martyr.
Another common strategy is painting trans people as delusional, mentally ill, crazy, etc. As if wanting to have an attractive female body wouldn't be rational.

They actually made a huge mistake signal boosting trans-maxxing since that painted transition as a rational decision for personal gain which goes against what they were pushing previously.

 

[Admin]

What about trans people and supposed allies on the right?
While there is nothing saying you cannot be on the right (even extreme right) and not also support trans rights there really isn't much of an audience for that in the US so what we end up with instead is people constantly simpling for conservative transphobes and attacking other trans people while they claim to support some trans people they view as the few good ones.

Example of supposed trans acceptance among some conservatives is to for example support femboys meaning that you do let some people born male present in a feminine manner but then they are never actually accepted as females and they will still be subjected to anti-male discrimination (such as conscription only for men, not allowed in women's sports even if they are at a disadvantage, etc).

Actual old-school right-wing ideology (territorial expansionism, imperialism, authoritarianism, hierarchy, etc) is actually more compatible with trans-rights than modern conservatism and gender-critical feminism.

If you really want to support trans-rights why not do it on a global scale via imperialism?

Why not expand our borders a bit if we gain control over a government?

There is however very few people pushing for those values these days to the point it maybe shouldn't even be considered right-wing anymore due to right-wing now referring to stupid modern ideals like protecting women's sports and letting people with Iq under 80 easily obtain guns. The real right-wing policy would be to only allow the elite to have access to guns.

 

[Admin]

Conservatives utterly fail every time they are given the chance to govern
Often they talk about things like supporting traditional family values or whatever as the fertility rate keeps dropping lower and of course they have no effective policies for reverting that.

https://vintologi.com/threads/debunking-cuckservatism.1089/#post-6446

Reality: you cannot effectively raise the fertility rate without mass-rape which is why politicians tend to instead support immigration in an attempt to prevent a catatrophic population collapse (or at least buy some time) which actually has a better track-record than the 100% failure rate of cuckservatism.

In fact the only politicians i can think of that had moderate success in raising the fertility rate is the communist dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu with decree 770

Even nazi germany failed at raising the fertility-rate (they only had a minor temporary increase due to improved economy, similar things happened in other countries).

 

[Creamer]

if you are not a grifter big tech and the media won't let you speak publicly.

if any non grifter wants a shot, his only chance is with leaflets and graffiti