- Messages
- 916
Actually, the globalists are trying to do stuff like ban international travel that's for the purpose of sex trafficking. E.g., they want to make it so that if you're from a western country, you can be prosecuted by your own country's authorities if they catch you trying to travel abroad to have sex with kids. They also want to require the third world countries' police to cooperate in investigating these cases. The NGOs pushing for that kind of stuff are associated with globalist institutions like the UN; they want to have treaties that will require countries to impose those kinds of criminal sanctions, and they want to call out those who lag behind in doing so.
Globalists also tend to be feminists. Feminists are trying to ensure that worldwide, the age of consent and the marriageable age are raised, and that girls are sent to school rather than forced into marriage. The result of this is that there will be fewer children; and what children exist, especially girls, will be harder for men to gain access to using their superior economic position.
I would think, if one wanted to make it easier for pedophiles to gain access to kids, the proper globalist policy would be to encourage patriarchy worldwide, and loosen the restrictions on sex tourism and importing foreign brides. One would want to make it legal to bring in young kids, wife them up, and beat them to make them submit to sex. What the globalists are doing is the opposite; they're trying to regulate that stuff. They want to criminalize attempts to control females as "human trafficking" when it involves international travel.
People think, "Oh, by undermining the role of fathers, the ultimate goal is to remove kids from the protection of said fathers." There's a grain of truth to that, in that single moms' kids are notoriously accessible sometimes to, say, a stepdad who's willing to overlook the fact that his girlfriend is overweight, wrinkled, and has saggy tits, and bears the marks of trauma from having carried and given birth to another guy's kids. It may even be that some of the girls Epstein was trafficking were the daughters of single moms, who became runaways; it wouldn't surprise me at all.
But that's a far cry from the kind of human trafficking people think of, when they think of a globohomo pedophile conspiracy. Those girls are not able to run away till they become old enough to do so, for one thing. Epstein was probably not able or willing to easily access five year olds, for instance. They were more like 16-year-old girls who wanted to become prostitutes because that sounded like a fun idea. They would get to hang out in the Virgin Islands, sunning themselves on the beach and merely having to suck some old rich/powerful dude's cock once in awhile. A lot of women would probably love to have a life like that, free of having to go to school or hold a 9-5 job. They don't even have to submit to a man for more than however long it takes him to come once his penis is in her mouth; they can just run free the rest of the time. They're like the Eloi in The Time Machine.
It may be that gays will eventually try to normalize sex with teen boys, but again, the problem arises of how they're going to groom them and get hold of them. The thing is, these boys who are having sex with older men usually either belong to some pederastic religious institution like the Catholic Church, or they are just already inclined to be gay, I'm thinking. It's not like the situation with girls, where they're born whores from the get-go, and it's just a matter of activating them. There are a limited number of boys who will be open to these relationships with older men, and I don't know that even increasing the number of single moms out there is gonna really help much in gaining older men that desired access to them, because those men would have to stomach the idea of pretending to be heterosexual in order to be with her. Plus, I think boys are more likely to assert their autonomy and stand up for what they want or don't want, than girls are, regardless of what system or culture is in place.
Globalists also tend to be feminists. Feminists are trying to ensure that worldwide, the age of consent and the marriageable age are raised, and that girls are sent to school rather than forced into marriage. The result of this is that there will be fewer children; and what children exist, especially girls, will be harder for men to gain access to using their superior economic position.
I would think, if one wanted to make it easier for pedophiles to gain access to kids, the proper globalist policy would be to encourage patriarchy worldwide, and loosen the restrictions on sex tourism and importing foreign brides. One would want to make it legal to bring in young kids, wife them up, and beat them to make them submit to sex. What the globalists are doing is the opposite; they're trying to regulate that stuff. They want to criminalize attempts to control females as "human trafficking" when it involves international travel.
People think, "Oh, by undermining the role of fathers, the ultimate goal is to remove kids from the protection of said fathers." There's a grain of truth to that, in that single moms' kids are notoriously accessible sometimes to, say, a stepdad who's willing to overlook the fact that his girlfriend is overweight, wrinkled, and has saggy tits, and bears the marks of trauma from having carried and given birth to another guy's kids. It may even be that some of the girls Epstein was trafficking were the daughters of single moms, who became runaways; it wouldn't surprise me at all.
But that's a far cry from the kind of human trafficking people think of, when they think of a globohomo pedophile conspiracy. Those girls are not able to run away till they become old enough to do so, for one thing. Epstein was probably not able or willing to easily access five year olds, for instance. They were more like 16-year-old girls who wanted to become prostitutes because that sounded like a fun idea. They would get to hang out in the Virgin Islands, sunning themselves on the beach and merely having to suck some old rich/powerful dude's cock once in awhile. A lot of women would probably love to have a life like that, free of having to go to school or hold a 9-5 job. They don't even have to submit to a man for more than however long it takes him to come once his penis is in her mouth; they can just run free the rest of the time. They're like the Eloi in The Time Machine.
It may be that gays will eventually try to normalize sex with teen boys, but again, the problem arises of how they're going to groom them and get hold of them. The thing is, these boys who are having sex with older men usually either belong to some pederastic religious institution like the Catholic Church, or they are just already inclined to be gay, I'm thinking. It's not like the situation with girls, where they're born whores from the get-go, and it's just a matter of activating them. There are a limited number of boys who will be open to these relationships with older men, and I don't know that even increasing the number of single moms out there is gonna really help much in gaining older men that desired access to them, because those men would have to stomach the idea of pretending to be heterosexual in order to be with her. Plus, I think boys are more likely to assert their autonomy and stand up for what they want or don't want, than girls are, regardless of what system or culture is in place.
Last edited:
