I
mentioned earlier that we should breed girls like cattle, by having a farm where Stacies are raised from birth for the sole purpose of producing and raising girls to become wives. But let's look into the nuts and bolts of how this would work, to see how much this would actually cost.
Let's assume each Stacy becomes able to bear children at age 15, and that she can produce an average of one girl a year, till she becomes infertile at age 30. That's 15 years of childbearing, producing a total of 15 girls.
We'll assume that modern technology can eliminate undesired production of boys (e.g. through abortion or sex selection). We'll also assume that these Stacies are jacked up pretty heavily on fertility drugs, so that they can stay at that average of producing 1 girl per year (maybe it could even be more, with multiple pregnancies, but we'll just take a conservative estimate).
How much does it really cost to provide for a Stacy, assuming we're just feeding her on
some staples like lentils, white beans, bulgur, rice, and ingredients for soup, which would be ordered and prepared in bulk to supply the entire farm? Let's say, $2,000/year. Some might object, "What what healthcare" but I'm thinking we can minimize those kinds of expenses by just shooting Stacy in the head if she gets sick or injured.
So if we figure, Stacy's life is 30 years long before she's "retired" with extreme prejudice, that's a total cost of $60,000 over her lifespan, to produce, as calculated above, 15 girls, which works about to $4,000/girl.
Now, what about the expenses for the girls themselves? Maybe raising them will require $1,000/year, since they're smaller and they're not eating for two like Stacy is. Stacy can probably home school those girls, if they need any teaching at all, so that mostly eliminates educational expenses. Their purpose in life is mostly to cook, clean, and get fucked by their husbands, so they don't really need a lot of instruction beyond what the husband himself is going to give.
Assuming these girls get sold off at age 12, it costs a total of $12,000/girl to raise them. If we add in the $4,000/girl production cost, that's a total of $16,000/girl. (I've already factored into these costs the miscellaneous costs, such as having a Chad around to impregnate all these Stacies, so there's no need to add that in separately.)
Why don't we just solve the inceldom problem that way? That's how we solve the food problem; we breed and raise animals and then sell them, and it ends up not being all that expensive. You can get a cheeseburger for $1 at McDonald's, because of modern farming techniques.
It would be really expensive if everyone had their own cow, and you had to go to your neighbor and try to bargain with him for hamburger meat. It's much more efficient to just have a comparatively small number of men specialize in mass-producing cows, and then let the customers browse the store.
Individual men will still be producing daughters, but that will mostly be as a hobby, much like how a lot of families have a small backyard garden, or a rabbit hutch, even though they get most of their food from the grocery store.
Unless you have an incest fetish, there's really not a lot of reason to raise your own daughters. They won't be able to compete in the sexual marketplace with Chad and Stacy's mass-produced offspring, unless you have something intriguing and unique to offer, in the genetics or culture you gave your child (kind of like how a microbrewery might have some special ingredients or techniques). Plus, if you give away your daughter in marriage, then you have to deal with in-laws. You might as well just produce sons to propagate your family genetics and culture, and forget about raising daughters, because they're not needed when we have as many girls as we could possibly want rolling off the assembly lines.
Patriarchy 1.0 said that if you want a wife, you should go to the girl's father and see if he deems you worthy (and offer him a bride-price). Feminism said, you should go to the girl herself and see if she deems you worthy (and offer her some betabuxx). Patriarchy 2.0 says, just buy her from the store.
The customer is supposed to be right. Well, you're the man with the money, right? Stores don't judge their customers to see if they DESERVE to be allowed to make a purchase; money is simply exchanged for products. We, as men, should not be judged for our looks or anything else, when it comes time to get a wife; it should just be an economic transaction in which we, the customers, judge which girl we want.
And a wife shouldn't cost more than a new car. The same stuff goes into producing and selling a girl -- engineering, marketing, etc. Each year, there will be new models coming out. Maybe the 2019 wife will have a tighter pussy or give better blowjobs, once we figure out which genetics are responsible for those characteristics so we can create new breeds of girls accordingly. Maybe we'll develop a girl who's physiologically unable to get heavier than 150 pounds. When it becomes legal to sell girls, then there will be market incentives for research and development along these lines.
Also, once girls are more abundant, it'll be more affordable to discipline them, even to the point of getting rid of unsatisfactory wives. If your wife's getting older and her tits are starting to sag, and
her vagine hang like sleeve of wizard; or if she's being a bitch and won't even respond properly to spanking, it might be within your budget to just sell her to the knacker and get a new wife, since there will be plenty more young girls being produced to meet the demand.